On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
<Elliott(a)hp.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Dan Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 1:25 PM
> Subject: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH v2 08/20] libnd, nd_acpi: regions (block-
> data-window, persistent memory, volatile memory)
>
> A "region" device represents the maximum capacity of a BLK range (mmio
> block-data-window(s)), or a PMEM range (DAX-capable persistent memory or
> volatile memory), without regard for aliasing. Aliasing, in the
> dimm-local address space (DPA), is resolved by metadata on a dimm to
> designate which exclusive interface will access the aliased DPA ranges.
> Support for the per-dimm metadata/label arrvies is in a subsequent
> patch.
>
> The name format of "region" devices is "regionN" where, like
dimms, N is
> a global ida index assigned at discovery time. This id is not reliable
> across reboots nor in the presence of hotplug. Look to attributes of
> the region or static id-data of the sub-namespace to generate a
> persistent name.
...
> +++ b/drivers/block/nd/region_devs.c
...
> +static noinline struct nd_region *nd_region_create(struct nd_bus *nd_bus,
> + struct nd_region_desc *ndr_desc, struct device_type *dev_type)
> +{
> + struct nd_region *nd_region;
> + struct device *dev;
> + u16 i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ndr_desc->num_mappings; i++) {
> + struct nd_mapping *nd_mapping = &ndr_desc->nd_mapping[i];
> + struct nd_dimm *nd_dimm = nd_mapping->nd_dimm;
> +
> + if ((nd_mapping->start | nd_mapping->size) % SZ_4K) {
> + dev_err(&nd_bus->dev, "%pf: %s mapping%d is not 4K
> aligned\n",
> + __builtin_return_address(0),
Please use "KiB" rather than the unclear "K".
Ok.
Same comment for a dev_dbg print in patch 14.
It's a debug statement, but ok.
[..]
Could this include "nd" in the name, like "ndregion%d"?
The other dev_set_name calls in this patch set use:
btt%d
ndbus%d
nmem%d
namespace%d.%d
which are a bit more distinctive.
They sit on an "nd" bus and don't have global device nodes, I don't
see a need to make them anymore distinctive.