On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 11:01 AM Verma, Vishal L
On Sat, 2019-07-27 at 14:39 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Recent discussions on some platform implementations setting the LOCAL
> bit in namespace labels makes it apparent that this field should be
> decoded in the json representation.
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>
> ndctl/dimm.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/ndctl/dimm.c b/ndctl/dimm.c
> index b2b09b6aa9a2..8946dc74fe41 100644
> --- a/ndctl/dimm.c
> +++ b/ndctl/dimm.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ static struct json_object *dump_label_json(struct ndctl_dimm
> json_object_object_add(jlabel, "nlabel", jobj);
> + jobj = json_object_new_int64(le64_to_cpu(nslabel.flags));
Should we print this in hex instead?
/me goes to check why he didn't do this finds that this support
arrives in the next patch that adds --human support to read-labels.
So it's there in "ndctl/dimm: Add --human support to read-labels"