Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> writes:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:59:15PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Sorry for necroposting. I thought the point of the CEC was to make sure
> that the other registered decoders only ever saw uncorrected errors.
Ha, good point! You mean drivers/ras/cec.c, right?
If so, then I don't think we've ever talked about connecting
NVDIMM and whether that would make sense. Lemme add Dan.
I don't think there's a difference between MCEs for NVDIMMs and normal
DRAM. I'll let Dan confirm or deny that.
> How do we end up getting called with a correctable error?
Good question. We shouldn't.
So we need to figure out here how exactly should those things interact
and whether NFIT should get all errors reported or it should put all the
correctable errors through the decay thing, see the comment at the top
Thx for pointing that out Jeff.
Sure, thanks for the quick reply, Boris! Also, thanks for your detailed
commit messages. They really help with understanding the code changes.