On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 09:58 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani(a)hpe.com>
wrote:
> x86 does not define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE, which
> leads /dev/mem to use the default valid_phys_addr_range()
> and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range() in drivers/char/mem.c.
>
> The default valid_phys_addr_range() allows any range lower
> than __pa(high_memory), which is the end of system RAM, and
> disallows any range higher than it.
>
> Persistent memory may be located at lower and/or higher
> address of __pa(high_memory) depending on their memory slots.
> When using crash(8) via /dev/mem for analyzing data in
> persistent memory, it can only access to the one lower than
> __pa(high_memory).
>
> Add x86 valid_phys_addr_range() and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range()
> to provide better checking:
> - Physical address range is valid when it is fully backed by
> IORESOURCE_MEM, regardless of __pa(high_memory).
> - Other ranges, including holes, are invalid.
>
> This also allows crash(8) to access persistent memory ranges
> via /dev/mem (with a minor change to remove high_memory check
> from crash itself).
If we're modifying crash(8) can't we also teach it to mmap /dev/pmemX
directly? With commit 90a545e98126 "restrict /dev/mem to idle io
memory ranges" /dev/mem should not have access to active pmem ranges.
Yes, I am aware of the commit. Unloading drivers while using crash(8) to
analyze NVDIMM via /dev/mem makes sense. /dev/mem does not require any
other drivers be loaded.
Using /dev/pmemX, on the other hand, requires the driver to be loaded,
which can be problematic. For instance, when btt_init() fails due to some
corruption in arena, it fails to create any pmem device file. A dev file
also restricts access range within the dev file.
Thanks,
-Toshi
ps.
Looking at iomem_is_exclusive(), it only checks the top-level iomem
entries. I think the pmem/btt driver only marks a child entry busy...