On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:17:11AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:11:17PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> FYI, an old blk_mq bug triggers new warnings on this commit. It's very
> reproducible and you may try the attached reproduce-* script.
> [ 4.447772] kobject (ffff88001c041f10): tried to init an initialized object,
something is seriously wrong.
> [ 4.453395] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-01216-g29dee3c
> [ 4.455534] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> [ 4.458252] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> [ 4.459708] Call Trace:
> [ 4.460611] dump_stack+0x19/0x27
> [ 4.461652] kobject_init+0xda/0xf0
> [ 4.462731] blk_mq_register_dev+0x31/0x150
> [ 4.463990] blk_register_queue+0x205/0x250
> [ 4.465217] device_add_disk+0x1ab/0x710
> [ 4.466384] sd_probe_async+0x11c/0x1e0
> [ 4.467544] async_run_entry_fn+0xbd/0x220
> [ 4.468760] process_one_work+0x4a7/0x990
> [ 4.469938] ? process_one_work+0x348/0x990
> [ 4.471168] worker_thread+0x342/0x8a0
> [ 4.472300] ? process_one_work+0x990/0x990
> [ 4.473540] kthread+0x188/0x190
> [ 4.474557] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
> [ 4.475850] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
So this was pre-existing wreckage? If so, that needs to be sorted first.
Because if the kobject stuff is broken, there's no way the refcount
stuff can begin to work.
Google just found me:
Let me see if that works.