Re: [LKP] [lkp] [locking/mutexes] cb4bbc457b: -40.0% unixbench.score
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:23:59AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
Davidlohr Bueso <dave(a)stgolabs.net> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>>FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>>https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>>
Ding-Tianhong/locking-mutexes-don-t-spin-on-owner-when-wait-list-is-not-NULL/20160121-173317
>>commit cb4bbc457bfed6194ffab1b10c7be73b3f16ca2d ("locking/mutexes: don't
spin on owner when wait list is not NULL.")
>
> I'm not sure why this would even be reported, as this patch has not been
accepted
> or acked or nothin', by anyone.
Sorry for bothering. The purpose is FYI as in the original report
email. We test patches posted to LKML, if we found some changes related
to the patch, we will send out a report. Hope the reviewer could
take that as information for his/her review if the report isn't totally
nonsense.
For me, the 0day reports on LKML postings have been quite helpful. They
give the submitter immediate feedback on a number of issues, thus reducing
the number of rounds of review.
Thanx, Paul