On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:02:55AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 08:27:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> I bet that the results vary depending on the type of CPU, and also on
> the kernel address-space layout, which of course also varies based on
> the Kconfig options. Let's see how the maintainers would like to proceed.
So I ran the "reproduce" script in the original mail on a KBL box here
with the .config tailored for it:
cpu family : 6
model : 158
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9600K CPU @ 3.70GHz
stepping : 12
microcode : 0xd6
I will also try to find a similar KBL in 0day to run the job. This
-4.5% comes from a CascadeLake AP which is 4 nodes, 96C/192T.
and I get mixed results. But I'd need to know how exactly they
the metrics "netperf.Throughput_total_tps" and
I have to admit I'm just a dumb user of 0day :) I'll leave this question
to Philip/Oliver/Rong who are from 0day team.
I assumed you've cloned the lkp-tests.git, and seems one Ruby file
is used to
process the output of the netperf.