On 09/18/2018 11:49 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Rong Chen
> On 09/13/2018 09:00 AM, Rong Chen wrote:
> On 09/12/2018 07:41 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> That commit only adds noop annotations, so this is most likely a false
> positive. I also can't make anything out of the error log you
> The issue is that the binary paths become garbled from this commit,
> and it can be reproduced on 0day-ci tree in high probability,
> It's possible that the commit is influenced by other merged commits.
> Could you confirm it on your own tree if you have time?
> Hi Andrey,
> Any update on this?
> Best Regards,
> Rong Chen
I'll take a look this week.
Do I understand correctly that I need to run the repro with my
patchset and without and check whether it differs?
Could you help to compare the 0day-ci repo
with your repo if there's no problem on your repo? btw, 0day robot
merged the patchset based on v4.19-rc1, is this right?