On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 14:42 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:05:19PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> commit 9d901bc05153bbf33b5da2cd6266865e531f0545 ("rhashtable: Free
> bucket tables asynchronously after rehash")
> With the commit, the possibility of OOM is increased under our boot
Can you gather some stats on how much memory rhashtable is actually
using? With that kernel you've probably got only one rhashtable user
which is netlink.
Bear in mind that this is a fairly low-memory machine (< 300M) so
it's not clear to me that this patch is the root cause of your OOM
Sorry, my fault. There are OOM for parent commit too, just some dmesg
difference, which I miss understood. Please ignore this report. I
will be more careful next time.