Paolo Abeni <pabeni(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 13:18 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if we should keep using an MPTCP-specific workqueue.
> > Server side, we don't expect the work to trigger very often, but should
> > that ever happen, top will tell easily.
> You mean switch msk->work from system_wq to a custom workqueue?
yep, e.g. reusing and renaming 'pm_wq'. When the PM works a lot (in
"ndiffports" mode as in issues/33), the pm_wq is visible in top - at
least in dbg build, I never tested with regular kconfig - and I like
being able to identify it easily. WDYT?
Can you do this?
I am not at all sure how you would like this to look like 8-(
(Merge parts of protocol.c into pm.c?)