[PATCH_v4 0/5] Private network request to ConnMan
by Guillaume Zajac
Hi,
Changelog from v3 is:
- Add private-network source/include
- ConnMan plugin is independant from emulator
- Each application that need VPN will pass a callback as argument
when private network is requested. This callback will contain the
private network settings.
Guillaume Zajac (5):
gatppp: Add new contructor to use external fd
private-network: add callback typedef drivers and settings
private-network: add request/release functions and new feature to
Makefile.am
emulator: add request/release private network calls
connman: add plugin in oFono to request request/release private
network
Makefile.am | 10 +-
gatchat/gatppp.c | 33 +++++-
gatchat/gatppp.h | 1 +
gatchat/ppp.h | 2 +-
gatchat/ppp_net.c | 40 ++++---
include/private-network.h | 59 +++++++++
plugins/connman.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/emulator.c | 49 ++++++--
src/ofono.h | 6 +
src/private-network.c | 89 ++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 556 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/private-network.h
create mode 100644 plugins/connman.c
create mode 100644 src/private-network.c
1 day, 8 hours
Read/Write EFcfis/EFcphs-cff files
by Jeevaka Badrappan
Hi,
This patch reads and writes the call forwarding unconditional status
from and to the SIM depending on the SIM file availability.
New property needs to be added due to the fact that number won't be
available from the cphs-cff file.
Incase of SIM, EFcphs-cff file holds call forwarding status and it
is represented as a flag. In case of USIM(EFcfis), we have the status
flag and also number.So, adding new property for status and using the
existing VoiceUnconditional with number will work for both SIM and USIM cases.
Other option is to have 2 properties, "VoiceUnconditional" and "Number".
"VoiceUnconditional" will have the status of the call forwarding( "enabled",
"disabled") whereas the "Number" property will have the call forwared number.
offline-online state transitions results in caching the call forwaring status
every time. To avoid this, call forwarding atom is moved to the post sim and
its moved also due to the fact that call forwarding status doesn't change in
roaming.
Regards,
Jeevaka
Jeevaka Badrappan (7):
call-forwarding: Read/Write cfis/cphs-cff
ifx: Move call forwarding to post sim
isigen: Move call forwarding to post sim
plugins/n900: Move call forwarding to post sim
phonesim: Move call forwarding to post sim
doc: Add new property to call forwarding
TODO: Marking the Read/Write EFcfis task as done
TODO | 9 --
doc/call-forwarding-api.txt | 5 +
doc/features.txt | 5 +
plugins/ifx.c | 2 +-
plugins/isigen.c | 2 +-
plugins/n900.c | 2 +-
plugins/phonesim.c | 3 +-
src/call-forwarding.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
8 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
1 day, 13 hours
[PATCH] Simcom support
by Anthony Viallard
Add SIMCOM support.
I developped this with the SIM5216E chipset and ofono 1.12.
- SMS and GPRS work (in the same time) ;
- SIM card presence check ;
- No voice part because I can't test it ;
- Use default characters set instead GSM because it works like that
for what I'm doing (SMS+GPRS) (by default, the set is IRA for SIM5216E).
Also, the SIMCOM doc affraids me about problems when using GSM
(this setting causes easily software flow control (XON /XOFF) problems.).
Signed-off-by: Anthony Viallard <homer242 at gmail.com>
--- ofono-1.12.orig/Makefile.am 2012-04-20 21:06:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ofono-1.12/Makefile.am 2013-01-21 17:17:48.089627277 +0100
@@ -371,6 +371,9 @@ builtin_sources += plugins/samsung.c
builtin_modules += sim900
builtin_sources += plugins/sim900.c
+builtin_modules += simcom
+builtin_sources += plugins/simcom.c
+
if BLUETOOTH
builtin_modules += bluetooth
builtin_sources += plugins/bluetooth.c plugins/bluetooth.h
--- ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sms.c 2012-04-20 21:06:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sms.c 2013-01-21 16:48:44.460627485 +0100
@@ -805,6 +807,7 @@ static gboolean build_cnmi_string(char *
case OFONO_VENDOR_NOVATEL:
case OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI:
case OFONO_VENDOR_ZTE:
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/* MSM devices advertise support for mode 2, but return an
* error if we attempt to actually use it. */
mode = "1";
diff -pruN ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sim.c ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sim.c
--- ofono-1.12.orig/drivers/atmodem/sim.c 2013-01-23 11:38:22.959609087 +0100
+++ ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/sim.c 2013-01-23 11:57:52.602608948 +0100
@@ -1023,12 +1023,18 @@ static void at_pin_send_cb(gboolean ok,
FALSE, cbd, g_free);
return;
case OFONO_VENDOR_ZTE:
case OFONO_VENDOR_ALCATEL:
case OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI:
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/*
* On ZTE modems, after pin is entered, SIM state is checked
* by polling CPIN as their modem doesn't provide unsolicited
* notification of SIM readiness.
+ *
+ * On SIMCOM modems, SIM is busy after pin is entered (we've
+ * got an "+CME ERROR: 14" at "AT+CPIN?" request) and ofono
+ * don't catch the "+CPIN: READY" message sent by the modem
+ * when SIM is ready. So, use extra CPIN to check the state.
*/
sd->sim_state_query = at_util_sim_state_query_new(sd->chat,
2, 20, sim_state_cb, cbd,
diff -purN ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c ofono-patched/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
--- ofono-1.12/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c 2013-01-18 15:04:03.598659165 +0100
+++ ofono-patched/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c 2013-01-18 14:54:03.256659236 +0100
@@ -1411,6 +1411,14 @@ static void at_creg_set_cb(gboolean ok,
}
switch (nd->vendor) {
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
+ /* Register for CSQ changes */
+ g_at_chat_send(nd->chat, "AT+AUTOCSQ=1,1", none_prefix,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ g_at_chat_register(nd->chat, "+CSQ:",
+ csq_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
+ break;
case OFONO_VENDOR_PHONESIM:
g_at_chat_register(nd->chat, "+CSQ:",
csq_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
@@ -1534,7 +1537,6 @@ static void at_creg_set_cb(gboolean ok,
break;
case OFONO_VENDOR_NOKIA:
case OFONO_VENDOR_SAMSUNG:
- case OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM:
/* Signal strength reporting via CIND is not supported */
break;
default:
--- /dev/null 2013-01-28 10:34:59.843091650 +0100
+++ ofono-1.12/plugins/simcom.c 2013-02-15 16:16:38.058552544 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,401 @@
+/*
+ *
+ * oFono - Open Source Telephony
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008-2011 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
+#include <config.h>
+#endif
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include <glib.h>
+#include <gatchat.h>
+#include <gattty.h>
+
+#define OFONO_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE
+#include <ofono/plugin.h>
+#include <ofono/modem.h>
+#include <ofono/devinfo.h>
+#include <ofono/netreg.h>
+#include <ofono/sim.h>
+#include <ofono/cbs.h>
+#include <ofono/sms.h>
+#include <ofono/ussd.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs-context.h>
+#include <ofono/radio-settings.h>
+#include <ofono/phonebook.h>
+#include <ofono/log.h>
+
+#include <drivers/atmodem/atutil.h>
+#include <drivers/atmodem/vendor.h>
+
+#define MAX_IGNITION_POOL_CALL 7
+
+#define CMEERR_SIMBUSY 14
+
+static const char *none_prefix[] = { NULL };
+
+struct simcom_data {
+ GAtChat *modem;
+ GAtChat *data;
+ guint ignition_pool;
+ unsigned int ignition_pool_call;
+ unsigned int at_ignition_pending;
+ ofono_bool_t have_sim;
+};
+
+/* Callback and helpers functions */
+static void simcom_debug(const char *str, void *user_data)
+{
+ const char *prefix = user_data;
+
+ ofono_info("%s%s", prefix, str);
+}
+
+static gboolean simcom_ignition(gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ ++data->ignition_pool_call;
+
+ if(data->at_ignition_pending > 0)
+ {
+ if(data->ignition_pool_call > MAX_IGNITION_POOL_CALL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Ignition timeout");
+ return FALSE;
+ }
+
+ /* Waiting reply of AT commands */
+ DBG("Waiting AT reply...");
+ return TRUE;
+ }
+
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, TRUE);
+
+ return FALSE;
+}
+
+static void simcom_sim_status(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct ofono_error error;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ --data->at_ignition_pending;
+
+ if(!ok)
+ {
+ decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
+ if(error.type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_CME)
+ {
+ if(error.error == CMEERR_SIMBUSY)
+ {
+ DBG("System is busy. Retry...");
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CPIN?",
+ none_prefix,
+ simcom_sim_status, modem,
+ NULL);
+ ++data->at_ignition_pending;
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ data->have_sim = FALSE;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* If doesn't have an "fatal" error on AT+CPIN request,
+ * we can guess there a SIM card ...
+ */
+ data->have_sim = TRUE;
+}
+
+static void cfun_enable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("");
+
+ if (!ok) {
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+ data->data = NULL;
+
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, FALSE);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Get model and sim card status */
+ data->at_ignition_pending = 0;
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CPIN?", none_prefix,
+ simcom_sim_status, modem, NULL);
+ ++data->at_ignition_pending;
+
+ data->ignition_pool = g_timeout_add_seconds(1,
+ simcom_ignition,
+ modem);
+}
+
+static void cfun_disable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("");
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+ data->data = NULL;
+
+ if (ok)
+ ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, FALSE);
+}
+
+static GAtChat *open_device(struct ofono_modem *modem,
+ const char *key,
+ char *debug)
+{
+ const char *device;
+ GIOChannel *channel;
+ GAtSyntax *syntax;
+ GAtChat *chat;
+ /* GHashTable *options; */
+
+ device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem, key);
+ if (device == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get modem '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ DBG("%s %s", key, device);
+
+ /* options = g_hash_table_new(g_str_hash, g_str_equal); */
+ /* if (options == NULL) */
+ /* return NULL; */
+
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Baud", "115200"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Parity", "none"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "StopBits", "1"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "DataBits", "8"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "XonXoff", "off"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "RtsCts", "on"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Local", "on"); */
+ /* g_hash_table_insert(options, "Read", "on"); */
+
+ channel = g_at_tty_open(device, NULL);
+
+ /* g_hash_table_destroy(options); */
+
+ if (channel == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get tty for '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ syntax = g_at_syntax_new_gsm_permissive();
+ chat = g_at_chat_new(channel, syntax);
+ g_at_syntax_unref(syntax);
+
+ g_io_channel_unref(channel);
+
+ if (chat == NULL)
+ {
+ ofono_error("Failed to get chat for '%s'", key);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ //if (getenv("OFONO_AT_DEBUG"))
+ g_at_chat_set_debug(chat, simcom_debug, debug);
+
+ return chat;
+}
+
+/* Modem interface function */
+static int simcom_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ data = g_try_new0(struct simcom_data, 1);
+ if (data == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ofono_modem_set_data(modem, data);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void simcom_remove(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ if(data->ignition_pool > 0)
+ {
+ g_source_remove(data->ignition_pool);
+ data->ignition_pool = 0;
+ }
+
+ ofono_modem_set_data(modem, NULL);
+
+ /* Cleanup after hot-unplug */
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->data);
+
+ g_free(data);
+}
+
+static int simcom_enable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ data->modem = open_device(modem, "Modem", "Modem: ");
+ if (data->modem == NULL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ data->data = open_device(modem, "Data", "Data: ");
+ if (data->data == NULL) {
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ g_at_chat_set_slave(data->modem, data->data);
+
+ g_at_chat_blacklist_terminator(data->data,
+ G_AT_CHAT_TERMINATOR_NO_CARRIER);
+
+ /* init modem */
+ g_at_chat_send(data->modem, "ATE0 +CMEE=1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "ATE0 +CMEE=1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CFUN=1", none_prefix,
+ cfun_enable, modem, NULL);
+
+ return -EINPROGRESS;
+}
+
+static int simcom_disable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ g_at_chat_cancel_all(data->modem);
+ g_at_chat_unregister_all(data->modem);
+
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->modem);
+ data->modem = NULL;
+
+ g_at_chat_cancel_all(data->data);
+ g_at_chat_unregister_all(data->data);
+
+ g_at_chat_send(data->data, "AT+CFUN=4", none_prefix,
+ cfun_disable, modem, NULL);
+
+ return -EINPROGRESS;
+}
+
+static void simcom_pre_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_sim *sim;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_devinfo_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ sim = ofono_sim_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
+ data->data);
+
+ if (sim)
+ ofono_sim_inserted_notify(sim, data->have_sim);
+}
+
+static void simcom_post_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_message_waiting *mw;
+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs;
+ struct ofono_gprs_context *gc;
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_phonebook_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+
+ ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
+ data->data);
+
+ /* gprs things */
+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->modem);
+
+ if(gprs && gc)
+ {
+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
+ }
+}
+
+static void simcom_post_online(struct ofono_modem *modem)
+{
+ struct simcom_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+
+ DBG("%p", modem);
+
+ ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem", data->data);
+ ofono_cbs_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+ ofono_ussd_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->data);
+}
+
+static struct ofono_modem_driver simcom_driver = {
+ .name = "simcom",
+ .probe = simcom_probe,
+ .remove = simcom_remove,
+ .enable = simcom_enable,
+ .disable = simcom_disable,
+ .pre_sim = simcom_pre_sim,
+ .post_sim = simcom_post_sim,
+ .post_online = simcom_post_online,
+};
+
+static int simcom_init(void)
+{
+ return ofono_modem_driver_register(&simcom_driver);
+}
+
+static void simcom_exit(void)
+{
+ ofono_modem_driver_unregister(&simcom_driver);
+}
+
+OFONO_PLUGIN_DEFINE(simcom, "SIMCOM modem driver", VERSION,
+ OFONO_PLUGIN_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,
+ simcom_init, simcom_exit)
1 day, 13 hours
IPV6 question
by Enrico Sau
Hi all,
As far as I understand, ofono doen't support IPV6 over ppp due to the fact
that IPV6 compression protocol implementation is missing.
Is that right?
Thank you,
Enrico
3 weeks, 3 days
Business
by Daser Jnr.
Hi all
>From a business point of view, can some one tell me what i can do with ofono
Cheers
Daser S.
3 months, 4 weeks
ofono with sim5320 module
by David Ashley
Hello, I'm at my wits' end trying to get ofono working with the
sim5320 module. I'm using the plugins/sim900.c module as a starting
point. I think the issue has something to do with the difference
between the MUX functionality between the 900 and the 5320. The sim900
supports the elaborate parameters sent on the
AT+CMUX=0,x,x,x,x, etc.
but the SIM5320 only supports
AT+CMUX=0
There's that... but also the way the sim900 plugin creates a
SETUP_DLC, initiates muxing, then deletes the setup DLC and creates 4
new DLC's... it didn't work for the sim5320 until I remapped the DLC's
somewhat like this:
#define NUM_DLC 4
#define VOICE_DLC 2
#define NETREG_DLC 1
//#define SMS_DLC 2
#define GPRS_DLC 3
#define SETUP_DLC 0
static char *dlc_prefixes[NUM_DLC] = {
[VOICE_DLC]="Voice: ",
[NETREG_DLC]="Net: ",
// [SMS_DLC]= "SMS: ",
[GPRS_DLC]= "GPRS: " ,
[SETUP_DLC]= "Setup: ",
};
Note I have to eliminate the SMS_DLC usage later in sim5320_post_sim:
// ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_SIMCOM, "atmodem",
// data->dlcs[SMS_DLC]);
OK everything is *ALMOST* working. ofonod interacts fine with
connmand, connmand tells ofonod to activate the sim5320, which
actually establishes a ppp connection and sets up a ppp device:
ppp0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-0
inet addr:30.97.132.47 P-t-P:30.97.132.47 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:124 (124.0 B)
Here's the rub: No matter what I do, I never get any RX packets from
that ppp device, and even when it appears to TX packets (I'm trying to
ping out) the machine on the internet isn't actually receiving them.
I'm running on a beaglebone with a custom board with a sim5320 module on it.
I have no idea what to try... Any advice would be appreciated...
Thanks very much!!!!
-Dave
4 years, 6 months
[PATCH 0/2] qmimodem: set data format when needed (and possible)
by Christophe Ronco
MC7430 is a raw-ip only modem. If accessed through 802.3 network interface,
no packets can be received (IP layer headers missing).
To be able to start a data connection with this modem, we must tell driver
(qmi_wwan.c) to mount a raw-ip network interface instead of a 802.3 interface.
This has been implemented in libqmi package. The idea is:
- ask modem what data format it wants (raw-ip or 802.3)
- ask driver what data format it expects (raw-ip or 802.3)
- change driver data format if values do not match
Patch has been split in two.
In first part, we just add the code needed to get/set driver expected data
format but nobody ever call these functions.
In second part, logic explained above is implemented.
If anything fail (can't get expected data format, can't get modem data format,
...), we just don't set anything and continue.
To be able to use this, a kernel 4.5 or more recent is needed.
Christophe Ronco (2):
qmimodem: get/set kernel device driver data format
qmimodem: change kernel driver data format if needed
drivers/qmimodem/gprs-context.c | 79 +++++++++++++++-
drivers/qmimodem/qmi.c | 200 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/qmimodem/qmi.h | 11 +++
drivers/qmimodem/wda.h | 25 +++++
4 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/qmimodem/wda.h
--
2.11.0
5 years, 4 months
Telit modem plugins.
by Piotr Haber
Hi.
Seems my rename of he910 plugin to xe910 was a little bit optimistic.
Looks like not only xE910 family modems use 1bc7:0021 USB IDs.
I got my hands on UE866 and it has the same default composition.
So this is another family, designed for embedded M2M/IoT applications
with different module form-factor, but having similar members (GE866 2G,
UE866 3.5G, LE866 4G)
And according to documentation UL865 should share the same USB IDs.
And as UL865 is an UMTS enabled, pin-compatible upgrade to GL865-DUAl V3
I would expect the latter will also have the same composition.
I could not find a definitive source of information on this.
So it seems the plugin needs a different name, again.
There is already "telit" plugin but this one supports modems based on
"option" serial ports and USB PIDs starting from 0x1003, this includes
CE/DE/LE910 (LE910 V1 that is, using QMI, which is end-of-life),
HE/LE920 and LE922/LE940A6.
Do you have any suggestions on the new name for this plugin?
I would go for something like "telit-acm" (cause it uses CDC-ACM serial
ports).
Best
Piotr
5 years, 4 months
[PATCH 0/3] support Telit LE910 V2 modem
by Piotr Haber
Introduce CDC-NCM driver for Telit modems.
Handle initialization of LE910V2 via udev.
Add model/variant recognition and setup.
Piotr Haber (3):
telitmodem: support for CDC-NCM network adapter
udevng: setup of Telit LE910V2
xe910: support for Telit LE910V2 modem
Makefile.am | 3 +-
drivers/telitmodem/gprs-context-ncm.c | 485 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/telitmodem/telitmodem.c | 2 +
drivers/telitmodem/telitmodem.h | 2 +
plugins/udevng.c | 14 +-
plugins/xe910.c | 16 +-
6 files changed, 516 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/telitmodem/gprs-context-ncm.c
--
2.11.0
5 years, 4 months
[PATCH 0/2] More generic support of Telit xE910 family
by Piotr Haber
Telit xE910 is a family of modems from 2g (GE910) through 3.5g
(HE910, UE910, DE910) to 4g (LE910).
They share a common programming interface.
So move he910 plugin to more generic xe910
and add support for UE910 (i was able to test on it).
Also differentiate between variants in terms of voice calling
and built-in GPS.
Piotr Haber (2):
plugins: rename he910 to xe910
plugins: Handle HE910 and UE910 variants
Makefile.am | 4 +-
plugins/udevng.c | 6 +-
plugins/{he910.c => xe910.c} | 237 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
rename plugins/{he910.c => xe910.c} (59%)
--
2.11.0
5 years, 5 months
