On 1/8/20 3:25 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
Somehow this went straight to my Junk folder, so I didn't see this
message at all until now.
> Audio application (e.g. pulseaudio) really do not want to handle two
> separate services to monitor and process HSP/HFP devices. >
> For audio application are HSP and HFP devices equivalent, they provide
> same features: SCO socket, API for controlling microphone and speaker
> gain; plus optionally specify used codec.
> So having two separate services which fully divided for audio
> application purpose does not make sense.
> So it is possible that both HSP and HFP audio cards would be available
> via one audio API? Because I do not see how it could be done via design
> like dundee.
One API sure. Maybe on multiple services. Honestly, I don't see why
this would be such a burden for PA to watch 2 dbus services instead of
1. From oFono perspective it would make more sense to keep the HSP part
a separate daemon. I could be convinced otherwise if it is indeed a big
burden for PA...
>> You can then implement the same API interfaces for setting up the HSP audio
>> stream as oFono does today (i.e. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/ofono/ofono.git/tree/doc/handsfree...),
> This API is unusable for both HSP and HFP audio streams. In pulseaudio
> it is somehow used, but it is not suitable.
Funny. "It is used but not suitable"?
> Main objection for handsfree-audio-api.txt is that it does not provide
> information about locally used codec and somehow mixes air codec and
> local codec. In my hsphfpd.txt I used term "AgentCodec" for bluetooth
> local codec and term "AirCodec" for bluetooth air codec format.
Okay. But, just FYI, at the time there was no hw that could do such
on-the-fly conversions, so this use case wasn't considered/implemented.
There's really no reason why we couldn't extend our APIs to handle this.
> Another objection against handsfree-audio-api.txt API is that it is
> bound to HF codecs (via number) and does not support for pass e.g. CSR
True. In retrospect we probably should have used strings. But it was
assumed that vendor extensions would go via the Bluetooth SIG Assigned
Numbers facility. Anyhow, we can always add a 'Register2' method that
could take codecs as a string array or a combination of strings & ints.
And if Register2 was used, then use 'NewConnection2' with a signature
that supports passing in vendor codecs and whatever else that might be
> What is completely missing in that API is controlling volume level.
It is there on the CallVolume interface
> And also API does not provide socket MTU information or ability to
> change/specify which codec would be used.
There was no need, we automatically defaulted to using Wide band if
available. Third party codecs are a new use case (for oFono HFP), so
would require an API extension.
> Non-audio APIs which are needed to export (for both HSP and HFP profiles):
> * battery level (0% - 100%)
> * power source (external, battery, unknown)
> * ability to send "our laptop" battery level and power source to remote device
> * send text message to embedded display
> * process button press event (exported via linux kernel uinput)
I think all of these are feasible to support under the current oFono
structure, either via plugins or API extensions.
This patch reads and writes the call forwarding unconditional status
from and to the SIM depending on the SIM file availability.
New property needs to be added due to the fact that number won't be
available from the cphs-cff file.
Incase of SIM, EFcphs-cff file holds call forwarding status and it
is represented as a flag. In case of USIM(EFcfis), we have the status
flag and also number.So, adding new property for status and using the
existing VoiceUnconditional with number will work for both SIM and USIM cases.
Other option is to have 2 properties, "VoiceUnconditional" and "Number".
"VoiceUnconditional" will have the status of the call forwarding( "enabled",
"disabled") whereas the "Number" property will have the call forwared number.
offline-online state transitions results in caching the call forwaring status
every time. To avoid this, call forwarding atom is moved to the post sim and
its moved also due to the fact that call forwarding status doesn't change in
Jeevaka Badrappan (7):
call-forwarding: Read/Write cfis/cphs-cff
ifx: Move call forwarding to post sim
isigen: Move call forwarding to post sim
plugins/n900: Move call forwarding to post sim
phonesim: Move call forwarding to post sim
doc: Add new property to call forwarding
TODO: Marking the Read/Write EFcfis task as done
TODO | 9 --
doc/call-forwarding-api.txt | 5 +
doc/features.txt | 5 +
plugins/ifx.c | 2 +-
plugins/isigen.c | 2 +-
plugins/n900.c | 2 +-
plugins/phonesim.c | 3 +-
src/call-forwarding.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
8 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
[sorry for the last mails where I got your last name mixed up...]
On 08/10/2017 07:03 AM, Eswaran Vinothkumar (BEG/PJ-IOT-EL) wrote:
> Could you send me the exact modem description you are using? So that we can write quirk?
> I am using TELIT 910 EUG Modem.
Okay, maybe that is already enough. I saw that in drivers/telit.c there
is already some code to handle variants of the modem. The matching is
done on these strings.
Are there any vid/pid available fot his modem?
I'm a member of the Plasma Mobile team and we are currently trying to
get our messaging and phone stack working. Having a distribution
packaged version of phonesim available would simplify things a lot for
us. However distributions are currently dropping Qt4 support and there
has been no release since Jonah Brüchert introduced support for Qt5 last
So in short, could you please do a new release of phonesim?
Thanks and regards
I am using a sim7600 with its evaluation kit.
To make the GPS work, I need to send the command AT+CGPS=1. What I can
do is just open the AT port and send the command. But maybe it should be
managed by ofono ? In that case, should I make another plugin, or should
it be included in location reporting ?
By the way, I have no org.ofono.LocationReporting in my dbus interface.