On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:24 PM, <Rajesh.Nagaiah(a)elektrobit.com> wrote:
Hi Lucas,
> +enum ofono_radio_band_gsm {
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_GSM_ANY = 0,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_GSM_850 = 1,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_GSM_900P = 2,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_GSM_900E = 3,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_GSM_1800 = 4,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_GSM_1900 = 5,
> +};
> +
> +enum ofono_radio_band_umts {
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_UMTS_ANY = 0,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_UMTS_850 = 1,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_UMTS_900 = 2,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_UMTS_1700AWS = 3,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_UMTS_1900 = 4,
> + OFONO_RADIO_BAND_UMTS_2100 = 5,
> +};
A minor coding style comment. Accodring to code style M11: Naming of
enums,
If the enum contents have values (e.g. from specification) then the
What I understood is that "specification" is just an example, it might
be because of other things.
But I agree with your comment.
Thanks, fixed.
Lucas De Marchi