Hi Alexander,
On 10/05/2010 07:41 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
On 05.10.2010 15:06, ext Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> doc/supplementaryservices-api.txt says nothing about return values of
>> SupplementeryServices.Initiate method (or that the method can take SS
>> requests in addition to USSD). Can the API designer/implementer fix this
>> please?
>
> why don't you just send a patch for it if it is unclear?
If it was a small update I would just send a patch. But a typical return
value for example is:
(u'CallBarring',
(u'interrogation',
u'AllBarringServices',
{u'DataAllIncoming': u'disabled',
u'DataAllOutgoing': u'disabled',
u'DataIncomingWhenRoaming': u'disabled',
u'DataInternationalOutgoing': u'disabled',
u'DataInternationalOutgoingExceptHome': u'disabled',
u'FaxAllIncoming': u'disabled',
u'FaxAllOutgoing': u'disabled',
u'FaxIncomingWhenRoaming': u'disabled',
u'FaxInternationalOutgoing': u'disabled',
u'FaxInternationalOutgoingExceptHome': u'disabled',
u'VoiceAllIncoming': u'disabled',
u'VoiceAllOutgoing': u'disabled',
u'VoiceIncomingWhenRoaming': u'disabled',
u'VoiceInternationalOutgoing': u'disabled',
u'VoiceInternationalOutgoingExceptHome': u'disabled'}))
Now multiply this by all possible combinations of supplementary
services, supplementary service operations and basic services. Remember
the second argument is a variant, so it's entirely freeform. So I sought
to ask about this on the list first.
This is on my TODO list, but honestly it would take you no more than 2
hours to do this yourself for most of the reply types. All the reply
generators are nicely compartmentalized (call-barring.c:
generate_ss_query_reply, call-forwarding.c: cf_ss_control_reply,
call-settings.c: generate_cw_ss_query_reply, clip_colp_colr_ss_query_cb)
And you don't really need to handle all the combinations, simply stating
that the elements returned in the dictionary were affected by the SS
operation is enough.
A patch(set) that changes the API shouldn't be accepted in the first
place if it doesn't properly update the documentation.
This patch set predates the launch of oFono as 'oFono'. So far nobody
has been attempting to use this API ;)
Regards,
-Denis