Re: [PATCH 5/7] cdmamodem: Add Signal Strength Support
Hi Rajesh
On 02/09/2011 02:58 PM, ext Rajesh.Nagaiah(a)elektrobit.com wrote:
Hi Dara,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ofono-bounces(a)ofono.org
> [mailto:ofono-bounces@ofono.org] On Behalf Of Dara Spieker-Doyle
> Sent: 08 February 2011 13:05
> To: ofono(a)ofono.org
> Subject: [PATCH 5/7] cdmamodem: Add Signal Strength Support
>
> +static gboolean cdma_get_next_number(const char *line, gint
> *number) {
> + int pos;
> + int end;
> + int len;
> + int value = 0;
> +
> + len = strlen(line);
> +
> + pos = 0;
> + end = pos;
> +
> + while (line[end]>= '0'&& line[end]<= '9') {
> + value = value * 10 + (int)(line[end] - '0');
> + end += 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (pos == end)
> + return FALSE;
> +
> + pos = skip_to_next_field(line, end, len);
> +
> + if (number)
> + *number = value;
> +
> + return TRUE;
> +}
> +
This is a duplicate of g_at_result_iter_next_number().
Why cant use this function instead of cdma_get_next_number() ?
This is different from g_at_result_iter_next_number() in that it takes a
raw response line to parse rather than the result iterator. The AT
syntax format of the response from this CDMA device does not follow the
GSM standard AT syntax format.
> +static void cdma_csq_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer
> +user_data) {
> + struct cb_data *cbd = user_data;
> + ofono_cdma_netreg_strength_cb_t cb = cbd->cb;
> + const char *prefix = cbd->user;
> + struct ofono_error error;
> + const char *attr;
> + int strength = -1;
> +
> + decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
> +
> + if (!ok) {
> + cb(&error, -1, cbd->data);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (at_util_parse_attr(result, prefix,&attr) == FALSE) {
> + CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cb, -1, cbd->data);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + cdma_get_next_number(attr,&strength);
> +
> + DBG("csq_cb: %d", strength);
> +
> + cb(&error, at_util_convert_signal_strength(strength),
> cbd->data); }
Refer csq_cb() implementation in /drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
If you are referring to the AT result iterator use in the atmodem csq
callback:- we cannot use that here due to the response format of this
CDMA device not being the same as the GSM standard.
The prefix in this case is not in the same line as the actual response
line, so I opted to use the same algorithm as attr_cb() in
/drivers/cdmamodem/devinfo for now and re-use at_util_parse_attr(),
taking the last line as the response.
This could well need to be extended for alternative CDMA AT devices
added in the future, as the CDMA AT syntax is not standardised.
Cheers
Dara