Hi Denis,
On 05/05/2011 06:11, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> diff --git a/include/emulator.h b/include/emulator.h
> index 5cd894b..a7fc23b 100644
> --- a/include/emulator.h
> +++ b/include/emulator.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,24 @@ enum ofono_emulator_request_type
ofono_emulator_request_get_type(
> void ofono_emulator_set_indicator(struct ofono_emulator *em,
> const char *name, int value);
>
> +ofono_bool_t ofono_emulator_setup_ppp(struct ofono_emulator *em, int fd,
> + const char *server_ip, const char *peer_ip,
> + const char *primary_dns,
> + const char *secondary_dns);
> +
> +int ofono_emulator_get_uid(struct ofono_emulator *em);
> +
I'm not particularly happy with this, we should try to de-couple the
private network provider from the emulator. We might end up with other
consumers later.
> +struct emulator_network_provision_driver {
> + char *name;
> + int (*get_settings)(struct ofono_emulator *em);
> + void (*release)(int uid);
> +};
> +
I'd say you're on the right track here, but modeling this even closer to
gprs-provision might be a good idea. Except you'll need to use a
callback, so something like:
struct ofono_private_network_settings {
...
};
typedef (ofono_private_network_cb_t)(...);
struct ofono_private_network_driver {
char *name;
int (*request)(ofono_private_network_cb_t cb, void *data);
void (*release)(int id);
};
> +int ofono_emulator_network_driver_register(
> + const struct emulator_network_provision_driver *d);
> +void ofono_emulator_network_driver_unregister(
> + const struct emulator_network_provision_driver *d);
> +
And then add __ofono_private_network_request / release to src/ofono.h
for now. Similar to how gprs_provision does things.
Should we add a new src into ofono that would implement those
request/release functions and register the ofono_private_network_driver?
Something like private-network-provision.c?
Then we would have the driver and callback type definition into
private-network-provision.h.
Kind regards,
Guillaume