[sorry for the late response, was on vacation]
On 03/25/2013 03:43 PM, Paulo Borges wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Wagner <wagi(a)monom.org
I have pushed all patches except patch #3. "dun_gw: Add BlueZ 5
version" from Frédéric just added recently the definition for
DUN_GW_UUID. Obviously, I needed to update your patches to use
DUN_GW_UUID instead of DUN_UUID. The bluez4.c file also uses
DUN_GW_UUID as identifier.
Thanks a lot,
Actually, DUN profile is "asymmetric": it doesn't have an UUID for each
role, they share the same UUID . The only way to distinguish the
current role is to specify it when registering the profile with
Specifying the role when registering a DUN profile is important because
only GW should expose a SDP record.
I see. The thing I wanted to avoid is to have twice a define for the
same value. In the end the way how the define is used (as you have
described above) is essential.