Hi Kristen,
On Mon, 10 May 2010 09:11:52 -0500
Denis Kenzior <denkenz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kristen,
>
> > If no read_handler specified, leave data alone in case someone
> > else wants to read it.
> > ---
> > gatchat/gatio.c | 4 ++++
> > gatchat/gsmdial.c | 12 ++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gatchat/gatio.c b/gatchat/gatio.c
> > index 61b0260..b4a3806 100644
> > --- a/gatchat/gatio.c
> > +++ b/gatchat/gatio.c
> > @@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ static gboolean received_data(GIOChannel *channel,
> > GIOCondition cond, if (cond & G_IO_NVAL)
> > return FALSE;
> >
> > + /* if nobody wants this data, leave it alone */
> > + if (io->read_handler == NULL)
> > + return TRUE;
> > +
>
> This is a really bad idea, we should never have cases where the read
> handler is unset, and if we do we should end up closing the socket when
> the buffer is full.
In your implementation of g_at_chat_suspend, you set the read handler to
NULL.
Correct, with the intent that someone else sets the read handler (e.g.
g_at_ppp)
Regards,
-Denis