7:06 a.m.
Here's v3 of my Huawei GPRS patches. I followed Marcel's advice and
implemented all Huawei quirks in the huawei plugin. Now the patches
are a lot smaller.
Please comment.
---
Kalle Valo (2):
huawei: add gprs context
huawei: detect SecondaryDevice which is used for events
drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c | 4 +
plugins/huawei.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
plugins/udev.c | 61 +++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
7:06 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] huawei: detect SecondaryDevice which is used for events
---
plugins/huawei.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
plugins/udev.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/plugins/huawei.c b/plugins/huawei.c
index df4d177..83a46e3 100644
--- a/plugins/huawei.c
+++ b/plugins/huawei.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
#include <drivers/atmodem/vendor.h>
struct huawei_data {
- GAtChat *chat;
+ GAtChat *chat, *event;
};
static int huawei_probe(struct ofono_modem *modem)
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static void huawei_remove(struct ofono_modem *modem)
ofono_modem_set_data(modem, NULL);
g_at_chat_unref(data->chat);
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->event);
g_free(data);
}
@@ -80,6 +81,11 @@ static void huawei_debug(const char *str, void *user_data)
ofono_info("%s", str);
}
+static void huawei_event_debug(const char *str, void *user_data)
+{
+ ofono_info("* %s", str);
+}
+
static void cfun_enable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
{
struct ofono_modem *modem = user_data;
@@ -120,6 +126,29 @@ static int huawei_enable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
if (getenv("OFONO_AT_DEBUG"))
g_at_chat_set_debug(data->chat, huawei_debug, NULL);
+ device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem, "SecondaryDevice");
+ if (!device)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ channel = g_at_tty_open(device, NULL);
+ if (!channel)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ syntax = g_at_syntax_new_gsm_permissive();
+ data->event = g_at_chat_new(channel, syntax);
+ g_at_syntax_unref(syntax);
+ g_io_channel_unref(channel);
+
+ if (!data->event)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ g_at_chat_add_terminator(data->event, "COMMAND NOT SUPPORT", -1,
+ FALSE);
+
+ if (getenv("OFONO_AT_DEBUG"))
+ g_at_chat_set_debug(data->event, huawei_event_debug, NULL);
+
+
g_at_chat_send(data->chat, "ATE0", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
g_at_chat_send(data->chat, "AT+CFUN=1", NULL,
@@ -138,6 +167,9 @@ static void cfun_disable(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer
user_data)
g_at_chat_unref(data->chat);
data->chat = NULL;
+ g_at_chat_unref(data->event);
+ data->event = NULL;
+
if (ok)
ofono_modem_set_powered(modem, FALSE);
}
@@ -148,6 +180,11 @@ static int huawei_disable(struct ofono_modem *modem)
DBG("%p", modem);
+ if (data->event) {
+ g_at_chat_cancel_all(data->event);
+ g_at_chat_unregister_all(data->event);
+ }
+
if (!data->chat)
return 0;
diff --git a/plugins/udev.c b/plugins/udev.c
index 3a6ea28..bdac4fd 100644
--- a/plugins/udev.c
+++ b/plugins/udev.c
@@ -89,6 +89,24 @@ static const char *get_serial(struct udev_device *udev_device)
return serial;
}
+static const char *get_usb_num(struct udev_device *udev_device)
+{
+ struct udev_list_entry *entry;
+ const char *num = NULL;
+
+ entry = udev_device_get_properties_list_entry(udev_device);
+ while (entry) {
+ const char *name = udev_list_entry_get_name(entry);
+
+ if (g_strcmp0(name, "ID_USB_INTERFACE_NUM") == 0)
+ num = udev_list_entry_get_value(entry);
+
+ entry = udev_list_entry_get_next(entry);
+ }
+
+ return num;
+}
+
#define MODEM_DEVICE "ModemDevice"
#define DATA_DEVICE "DataDevice"
#define GPS_DEVICE "GPSDevice"
@@ -201,18 +219,45 @@ static void add_hso(struct ofono_modem *modem,
static void add_huawei(struct ofono_modem *modem,
struct udev_device *udev_device)
{
- const char *devnode;
- int registered;
+ const char *devnode, *num;
+ int primary, secondary;
- registered = ofono_modem_get_integer(modem, "Registered");
- if (registered != 0)
+ primary = ofono_modem_get_integer(modem, "PrimaryRegistered");
+ secondary = ofono_modem_get_integer(modem, "SecondaryRegistered");
+
+ if (primary && secondary)
return;
- devnode = udev_device_get_devnode(udev_device);
- ofono_modem_set_string(modem, "Device", devnode);
+ num = get_usb_num(udev_device);
- ofono_modem_set_integer(modem, "Registered", 1);
- ofono_modem_register(modem);
+ /*
+ * Here is is assumed that that usb port number 0 is the control
+ * port and port 2 is the event port. This assumption will surely
+ * be false with some devices and better heuristics is needed.
+ */
+ if (g_strcmp0(num, "00") == 0) {
+ if (primary != 0)
+ return;
+
+ devnode = udev_device_get_devnode(udev_device);
+ ofono_modem_set_string(modem, "Device", devnode);
+
+ primary = 1;
+ ofono_modem_set_integer(modem, "PrimaryRegistered", primary);
+ } else if (g_strcmp0(num, "02") == 0) {
+ if (secondary != 0)
+ return;
+
+ devnode = udev_device_get_devnode(udev_device);
+ ofono_modem_set_string(modem, "SecondaryDevice", devnode);
+
+ secondary = 1;
+ ofono_modem_set_integer(modem, "SecondaryRegistered",
+ secondary);
+ }
+
+ if (primary && secondary)
+ ofono_modem_register(modem);
}
static void add_em770(struct ofono_modem *modem,
6:40 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] huawei: detect SecondaryDevice which is used for events
Hi Kalle,
Please keep the commit header to less than 50 lines.
+ device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem,
"SecondaryDevice");
+ if (!device)
+ return -EINVAL;
Two tabs is enough here.
+
+ channel = g_at_tty_open(device, NULL);
+ if (!channel)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ syntax = g_at_syntax_new_gsm_permissive();
+ data->event = g_at_chat_new(channel, syntax);
+ g_at_syntax_unref(syntax);
+ g_io_channel_unref(channel);
+
+ if (!data->event)
+ return -EIO;
+
+ g_at_chat_add_terminator(data->event, "COMMAND NOT SUPPORT", -1,
+ FALSE);
Don't mix spaces and tabs for indentation
+
+ if (getenv("OFONO_AT_DEBUG"))
+ g_at_chat_set_debug(data->event, huawei_event_debug, NULL);
+
+
Why the extra space?
Also, this entire sequence leaks the data->chat in case the 2nd port could not
be opened. See plugins/mbm.c for an example on how to do this better.
Regards,
-Denis
12:15 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] huawei: detect SecondaryDevice which is used for events
Denis Kenzior <denkenz(a)gmail.com> writes:
Hi Kalle,
Hi Denis,
Please keep the commit header to less than 50 lines.
Fixed.
> + device = ofono_modem_get_string(modem,
"SecondaryDevice");
> + if (!device)
> + return -EINVAL;
Two tabs is enough here.
Sorry, but I see only two tabs here. What am I missing? Ah, now I
understand. I think you are commenting the line earlier in
huawei_enable() which is indented wrong. I'll fix that.
> + channel = g_at_tty_open(device, NULL);
> + if (!channel)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + syntax = g_at_syntax_new_gsm_permissive();
> + data->event = g_at_chat_new(channel, syntax);
> + g_at_syntax_unref(syntax);
> + g_io_channel_unref(channel);
> +
> + if (!data->event)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + g_at_chat_add_terminator(data->event, "COMMAND NOT SUPPORT", -1,
> + FALSE);
Don't mix spaces and tabs for indentation
Fixed.
> +
> + if (getenv("OFONO_AT_DEBUG"))
> + g_at_chat_set_debug(data->event, huawei_event_debug, NULL);
> +
> +
Why the extra space?
You mean the newline, right? That's by accident, I removed it now.
Also, this entire sequence leaks the data->chat in case the 2nd
port
could not be opened. See plugins/mbm.c for an example on how to do
this better.
Damn, so it does. I changed it now to follow the style from mbm.c.
Thanks a lot for the comments.
--
Kalle Valo
7:06 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
Tested with Huawei E1552 HSDPA USB stick using a finnish Saunalahti prepaid
SIM.
---
drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c | 4 ++
plugins/huawei.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
b/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
index f7aafbe..f528339 100644
--- a/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
+++ b/drivers/atmodem/network-registration.c
@@ -916,6 +916,10 @@ static void at_creg_set_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result, gpointer
user_data)
cind_support_cb, netreg, NULL);
break;
+ case OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI:
+ /* huawei doesn't support CIND */
+ ofono_netreg_register(netreg);
+ break;
default:
g_at_chat_send(nd->chat, "AT+CIND=?", cind_prefix,
cind_support_cb, netreg, NULL);
diff --git a/plugins/huawei.c b/plugins/huawei.c
index 83a46e3..0d3373f 100644
--- a/plugins/huawei.c
+++ b/plugins/huawei.c
@@ -41,7 +41,10 @@
#include <ofono/gprs.h>
#include <ofono/voicecall.h>
#include <ofono/log.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs.h>
+#include <ofono/gprs-context.h>
+#include <drivers/atmodem/atutil.h>
#include <drivers/atmodem/vendor.h>
struct huawei_data {
@@ -211,14 +214,82 @@ static void huawei_pre_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
ofono_sim_inserted_notify(sim, TRUE);
}
+static void huawei_cgreg_notify(GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs = user_data;
+ gboolean ret;
+ int status;
+
+ DBG("");
+
+ ret = at_util_parse_reg_unsolicited(result, "+CGREG:", &status,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI);
+
+ if (ret == FALSE)
+ return;
+
+ ofono_gprs_status_notify(gprs, status);
+}
+
+static inline void report_signal_strength(struct ofono_netreg *netreg,
+ int strength)
+{
+ DBG("%d", strength);
+
+ if (strength == 99)
+ strength = -1;
+ else
+ strength = (strength * 100) / 31;
+
+ ofono_netreg_strength_notify(netreg, strength);
+}
+
+static void huawei_rssi_notify(GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_netreg *netreg = user_data;
+ GAtResultIter iter;
+ int strength;
+
+ g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
+
+ if (!g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, "^RSSI:"))
+ return;
+
+ if (!g_at_result_iter_next_number(&iter, &strength))
+ return;
+
+ report_signal_strength(netreg, strength);
+}
+
static void huawei_post_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
{
struct huawei_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_gprs_context *gc;
+ struct ofono_netreg *netreg;
+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs;
DBG("%p", modem);
- ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem", data->chat);
+ netreg = ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem",
+ data->chat);
ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_QUALCOMM_MSM, "atmodem", data->chat);
+
+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem",
+ data->chat);
+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, 0, "atmodem", data->chat);
+
+ if (gprs && gc) {
+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
+
+ /* huawei has a separate channel for CGREG notifications */
+ g_at_chat_register(data->event, "+CGREG:",
+ huawei_cgreg_notify, FALSE, gprs, NULL);
+
+ /* huawei uses non-standard "^RSSI:18" strings */
+ g_at_chat_register(data->event, "^RSSI:",
+ huawei_rssi_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
+ }
}
static struct ofono_modem_driver huawei_driver = {
6:44 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
Hi Kalle,
+ ret = at_util_parse_reg_unsolicited(result, "+CGREG:",
&status,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI);
No mixing of tabs & spaces for indentation
+
+ if (ret == FALSE)
+ return;
+
+ ofono_gprs_status_notify(gprs, status);
+}
+
+static inline void report_signal_strength(struct ofono_netreg *netreg,
+ int strength)
And here
+{
+ DBG("%d", strength);
+
+ if (strength == 99)
+ strength = -1;
+ else
+ strength = (strength * 100) / 31;
+
+ ofono_netreg_strength_notify(netreg, strength);
+}
You might really want to make this into an atutil function instead of copy-
pasting it around.
+
+static void huawei_rssi_notify(GAtResult *result, gpointer user_data)
+{
+ struct ofono_netreg *netreg = user_data;
+ GAtResultIter iter;
+ int strength;
+
+ g_at_result_iter_init(&iter, result);
+
+ if (!g_at_result_iter_next(&iter, "^RSSI:"))
+ return;
+
+ if (!g_at_result_iter_next_number(&iter, &strength))
+ return;
+
+ report_signal_strength(netreg, strength);
+}
+
static void huawei_post_sim(struct ofono_modem *modem)
{
struct huawei_data *data = ofono_modem_get_data(modem);
+ struct ofono_gprs_context *gc;
+ struct ofono_netreg *netreg;
+ struct ofono_gprs *gprs;
DBG("%p", modem);
- ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem", data->chat);
+ netreg = ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem",
+ data->chat);
Again with mixed indentation
ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_QUALCOMM_MSM,
"atmodem",
data->chat); +
+ gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem",
+ data->chat);
And here
+ gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, 0, "atmodem",
data->chat);
+
+ if (gprs && gc) {
+ ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
+
+ /* huawei has a separate channel for CGREG notifications */
+ g_at_chat_register(data->event, "+CGREG:",
+ huawei_cgreg_notify, FALSE, gprs, NULL);
And here
+
+ /* huawei uses non-standard "^RSSI:18" strings */
+ g_at_chat_register(data->event, "^RSSI:",
+ huawei_rssi_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
And here
+ }
}
static struct ofono_modem_driver huawei_driver = {
Regards,
-Denis
12:35 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
Denis Kenzior <denkenz(a)gmail.com> writes:
Hi Kalle,
Hi again Denis,
> + ret = at_util_parse_reg_unsolicited(result,
"+CGREG:", &status,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL,
> + OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI);
No mixing of tabs & spaces for indentation
Fixed.
Oh man, I have to fix my emacs settings :/
> +
> + if (ret == FALSE)
> + return;
> +
> + ofono_gprs_status_notify(gprs, status);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void report_signal_strength(struct ofono_netreg *netreg,
> + int strength)
And here
This function is gone now.
> + DBG("%d", strength);
> +
> + if (strength == 99)
> + strength = -1;
> + else
> + strength = (strength * 100) / 31;
> +
> + ofono_netreg_strength_notify(netreg, strength);
> +}
You might really want to make this into an atutil function instead of copy-
pasting it around.
I created this:
static inline int at_util_convert_signal_strength(int strength)
{
int result;
if (strength == 99)
result = -1;
else
result = (strength * 100) / 31;
return result;
}
> - ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI,
"atmodem", data->chat);
> + netreg = ofono_netreg_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem",
> + data->chat);
Again with mixed indentation
Fixed.
> ofono_sms_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_QUALCOMM_MSM,
"atmodem",
> data->chat); +
> + gprs = ofono_gprs_create(modem, OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI, "atmodem",
> + data->chat);
And here
Fixed.
> + gc = ofono_gprs_context_create(modem, 0, "atmodem",
data->chat);
> +
> + if (gprs && gc) {
> + ofono_gprs_add_context(gprs, gc);
> +
> + /* huawei has a separate channel for CGREG notifications */
> + g_at_chat_register(data->event, "+CGREG:",
> + huawei_cgreg_notify, FALSE, gprs, NULL);
And here
Fixed.
> +
> + /* huawei uses non-standard "^RSSI:18" strings */
> + g_at_chat_register(data->event, "^RSSI:",
> + huawei_rssi_notify, FALSE, netreg, NULL);
And here
Fixed.
Thank you for the comments. I'll run some tests first and send v4 soon.
--
Kalle Valo
12:59 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
Hi Kale
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:35 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
Denis Kenzior <denkenz(a)gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Kalle,
Hi again Denis,
>> + ret = at_util_parse_reg_unsolicited(result, "+CGREG:", &status,
>> + NULL, NULL, NULL,
>> + OFONO_VENDOR_HUAWEI);
>
> No mixing of tabs & spaces for indentation
Fixed.
Oh man, I have to fix my emacs settings :/
Did you find a set of emacs offset settings to get to oFono's liking?
I've been fiddling with it for a while, but keep alking in circles
around it. It's been too long since I've done emacs config :(
thanks!
10:54 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky(a)linux.intel.com> writes:
Hi Kale
Hi Inaky,
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:35 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Denis Kenzior <denkenz(a)gmail.com> writes:
>
> > No mixing of tabs & spaces for indentation
>
> Fixed.
>
> Oh man, I have to fix my emacs settings :/
Did you find a set of emacs offset settings to get to oFono's liking?
I've been fiddling with it for a while, but keep alking in circles
around it. It's been too long since I've done emacs config :(
This is my setup:
; from linux/Documentation/CodingStyle
(defun c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only (ignored)
"Line up argument lists by tabs, not spaces"
(let* ((anchor (c-langelem-pos c-syntactic-element))
(column (c-langelem-2nd-pos c-syntactic-element))
(offset (- (1+ column) anchor))
(steps (floor offset c-basic-offset)))
(* (max steps 1)
c-basic-offset)))
(add-hook 'c-mode-common-hook
(lambda ()
;; Add kernel style
(c-add-style
"linux-tabs-only"
'("linux" (c-offsets-alist
(arglist-cont-nonempty
c-lineup-gcc-asm-reg
c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only))))))
And whenever I start editing ofono or connman, I run command "C-c .
linux-tabs-only" choose the style. But it's not perfect yet, for example
I need to manually add tabs when having multi-line function calls.
--
Kalle Valo
10:29 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
Hi Kale
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 08:54 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
....
>> Oh man, I have to fix my emacs settings :/
>
> Did you find a set of emacs offset settings to get to oFono's liking?
> I've been fiddling with it for a while, but keep alking in circles
> around it. It's been too long since I've done emacs config :(
This is my setup:
; from linux/Documentation/CodingStyle
(defun c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only (ignored)
"Line up argument lists by tabs, not spaces"
(let* ((anchor (c-langelem-pos c-syntactic-element))
(column (c-langelem-2nd-pos c-syntactic-element))
(offset (- (1+ column) anchor))
(steps (floor offset c-basic-offset)))
(* (max steps 1)
c-basic-offset)))
Thanks! Phew ... this is a handful of lisp! I don't understand anything
that is not basic anymore :) -- I gave it a whiz and one thing I saw was
that
struct tx_queue_entry *__ofono_sms_txq_submit(struct ofono_sms *sms,
GSList *list,
unsigned int flags, unsigned msg_id,
ofono_sms_msg_stch_cb_t stch_cb,
void *data, ofono_destroy_func destroy)
is being formatted as:
struct tx_queue_entry *__ofono_sms_txq_submit(struct ofono_sms *sms,
GSList *list,
unsigned int flags, unsigned msg_id,
ofono_sms_msg_stch_cb_t stch_cb,
void *data, ofono_destroy_func destroy)
ie: one c-basic-offset less than it should -- I really can't figure out where to
poke.
(add-hook 'c-mode-common-hook
(lambda ()
;; Add kernel style
(c-add-style
"linux-tabs-only"
'("linux" (c-offsets-alist
(arglist-cont-nonempty
c-lineup-gcc-asm-reg
c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only))))))
And whenever I start editing ofono or connman, I run command "C-c .
linux-tabs-only" choose the style. But it's not perfect yet, for example
I need to manually add tabs when having multi-line function calls.
I have a code snippet for automate the mode setting:
;; Initialization hook
(add-hook 'c-mode-common-hook 'c-select-style)
;; this looks at the path and based on the name, sets a style -- it
;; is setup to my work habits -- I keep all my ofono work in
;; ~/something/ofono/ofono.git, kernel work in ~/something/linux/*..
(defun c-select-style ()
(let
((style c-default-style))
(if (string-match
"linux[^/]*"
buffer-file-truename)
(progn
(c-set-style "linux")
(setq indent-tabs-mode t)
(setq c-basic-offset 8)
(setq style "linux")
)
(if (string-match "ofono[^/]*/" buffer-file-truename)
(progn
;; I renamed your c-style to 'ofono' so not to get confused :)
(c-set-style "ofono")
(setq indent-tabs-mode t)
(setq c-basic-offset 8)
(setq style "ofono")
)
;; Default
(progn
(c-set-style "linux")
(setq indent-tabs-mode t)
(setq c-basic-offset 8)
(setq style "ofono")
)
)
)
(setq c-indent-comments-syntactically-p t)
(define-key c-mode-map "\C-m" 'c-context-line-break)
(c-toggle-auto-hungry-state 1)
(message (concat "C style set to " style))
)
)
12:26 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky(a)linux.intel.com> writes:
Hi Kale
Hola,
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 08:54 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> This is my setup:
>
> ; from linux/Documentation/CodingStyle
> (defun c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only (ignored)
> "Line up argument lists by tabs, not spaces"
> (let* ((anchor (c-langelem-pos c-syntactic-element))
> (column (c-langelem-2nd-pos c-syntactic-element))
> (offset (- (1+ column) anchor))
> (steps (floor offset c-basic-offset)))
> (* (max steps 1)
> c-basic-offset)))
Thanks! Phew ... this is a handful of lisp! I don't understand anything
that is not basic anymore :)
It sure is. I just copied it from Linux CodingStyle document and it
seems to work somehow.
-- I gave it a whiz and one thing I saw was that
struct tx_queue_entry *__ofono_sms_txq_submit(struct ofono_sms *sms,
GSList *list,
unsigned int flags, unsigned msg_id,
ofono_sms_msg_stch_cb_t stch_cb,
void *data, ofono_destroy_func destroy)
is being formatted as:
struct tx_queue_entry *__ofono_sms_txq_submit(struct ofono_sms *sms,
GSList *list,
unsigned int flags, unsigned msg_id,
ofono_sms_msg_stch_cb_t stch_cb,
void *data, ofono_destroy_func destroy)
ie: one c-basic-offset less than it should -- I really can't figure out where to
poke.
That's my problem as well. Currently I just manually add one more tab to
each line with M-i. If you find a way to fix this, please let me know.
--
Kalle Valo
9:56 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] huawei: add gprs context
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:26 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky(a)linux.intel.com> writes:
> Hi Kale
Hola,
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 08:54 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> This is my setup:
>>
>> ; from linux/Documentation/CodingStyle
>> (defun c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only (ignored)
>> "Line up argument lists by tabs, not spaces"
>> (let* ((anchor (c-langelem-pos c-syntactic-element))
>> (column (c-langelem-2nd-pos c-syntactic-element))
>> (offset (- (1+ column) anchor))
>> (steps (floor offset c-basic-offset)))
>> (* (max steps 1)
>> c-basic-offset)))
>
> Thanks! Phew ... this is a handful of lisp! I don't understand anything
> that is not basic anymore :)
It sure is. I just copied it from Linux CodingStyle document and it
seems to work somehow.
> -- I gave it a whiz and one thing I saw was that
>
> struct tx_queue_entry *__ofono_sms_txq_submit(struct ofono_sms *sms,
> GSList *list,
> unsigned int flags, unsigned msg_id,
> ofono_sms_msg_stch_cb_t stch_cb,
> void *data, ofono_destroy_func destroy)
>
> is being formatted as:
>
> struct tx_queue_entry *__ofono_sms_txq_submit(struct ofono_sms *sms,
> GSList *list,
> unsigned int flags, unsigned msg_id,
> ofono_sms_msg_stch_cb_t stch_cb,
> void *data, ofono_destroy_func destroy)
>
> ie: one c-basic-offset less than it should -- I really can't figure out where to
poke.
That's my problem as well. Currently I just manually add one more tab to
each line with M-i. If you find a way to fix this, please let me know.
I think I found it, seems to cut it; replace:
(steps (floor offset c-basic-offset)))
with
(steps (floor (+ offset (- c-basic-offset 1)) c-basic-offset)))
Lisp nuts me out, but it is doing the:
steps = floor(offset/c-basic-offset);
with
steps = floor((offset + c-basic-offset - 1) / c-basic-offset);
thus making sure there is always one more tab except when the offset is
right on a tab boundary that we keep the same.
So far, so good -- probably it fails in some case, because this is
totally trial and error as unscientific as it can :)
3581
days inactive
3665
days old
11 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Denis Kenzior -
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez -
Kalle Valo