2:25 a.m.
On (11/09/12 23:19), Austin Zhang wrote:
> is this correct?
I listed it here for your reference.
thanks a lot!
I'll take a look.
-ss
12.04
# dpkg -L libnl1 | grep so
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libnl.so.1.1
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libnl.so.1
# dpkg -L libnl2 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2
# dpkg -L libnl-3-200 | grep so
/lib/libnl-3.so.200.3.0
/lib/libnl-3.so.200
# dpkg -L libnl-genl-3-200 | grep so
/lib/libnl-genl-3.so.200.3.0
/lib/libnl-genl-3.so.200
11.10
$ dpkg -L libnl1 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl.so.1.1
/usr/lib/libnl.so.1
$ dpkg -L libnl2 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2
$ dpkg -L libnl3 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl.so.3
> is 11.10 still supported?
I thought it should, but it is up to you all maintainers:-)
2012/11/9 Sergey Senozhatsky <[1]sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
On (11/09/12 20:18), Austin Zhang wrote:
> > successful configure itself is useless, build is the one that
matters.
> Yes, I agree this, I just mean "not install genl is not the excuse
of fail
> to configure in _above_ cases".
sorry, not sure.
missing dependency is a very good reason to fail configure. in fact,
configure is performed
to validate system if it fits minimum build requirements. and in our
case missing libnl
and libnl-genl are a show stoppers.
but yes, we have a problem with that ubuntu package mess that we have to
address.
> After double check, in libnl-3 of ubuntu 11.10 (sorry, I wrote it
as 11.04
> in above email) includes these content of lib-genl, so in 11.10, no
> libnl-genl, which only is in 12.04, where the nl version is: 3.2.3.
> and for libnl2, also no genl.
>
is this correct?
ubuntu libnl-3.*.so libnl-genl-3.*.so libnl-2.*.so
libnl-genl-2.*.so
11.10 + - + -
12.04 + + + +
is 11.10 still supported? if support for that version is discontinued
then I'm not sure
we really must care.
-ss
> 2012/11/9 Sergey Senozhatsky <[1][2]sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
>
> On (11/09/12 19:43), Austin Zhang wrote:
> > >�but there are no evidence of,
> > nl-gen will only impact compile rather than configure,
right?
> > Those above build time error will happen in upstream version
if you
> only
> > install libnl3 but libnl-genl-3 for libnl3 case.
> > But anyway, it shouldn't impact 'configure' action.�
> >
>
> disagree, successful configure itself is useless, build is the
one that
> matters.
> if one does not have all requirements for build, failed configure
is ok.
>
> -ss
>
> > 2012/11/9 Sergey Senozhatsky
<[1][2][3]sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
> >
> > On (11/09/12 19:17), Austin Zhang wrote:
> > > � �libnl3:
> > > � �libnl-3.0 � � � � � � � � � � �libnl - Convenience
library
> for
> > netlink
> > > � �sockets
> > > � �libnl2:
> > > � �libnl-2.0 � � � � � � � � � � �libnl - Convenience
library
> for
> > netlink
> > > � �sockets
> > >
> >
> > so, libnl-3.0.pc and libnl-2.0.pc are there, but there are
no
> evidence
> > of, for example,
> > libnl-genl
> >
> > pkg-config output on Arch
> > libnl-3.0 � � � � � � � � � libnl - Convenience library
for
> netlink
> > sockets
> > libnl-cli-3.0 � � � � � � � libnl-cli - Command Line
Interface
> library
> > for netlink sockets
> > libnl-nf-3.0 � � � � � � � �libnl-nf - Netfilter Netlink
Library
> > libnl-route-3.0 � � � � � � libnl-route - Netlink Routing
Family
> Library
> > libnl-genl-3.0 � � � � � � �libnl-genl - Generic Netlink
Library
> >
> > in case if we remove libnl-genl from PKG_CHECK_MODULES,
we'll
> break the
> > build, because LIBNL_LIBS
> > should be '-lnl-genl-3 -lnl-3', not just
'-lnl-3'.
> >
> > [..]
> > src/tuning/iw.c:89: undefined reference to `genl_connect'
> > src/tuning/iw.c:95: undefined reference to
> `genl_ctrl_alloc_cache'
> > src/tuning/iw.c:101: undefined reference to
> `genl_ctrl_search_by_name'
> > and so on...
> >
> > looks like we need to workaround ubuntu.
> >
> > � � � � -ss
> >
> > References
> >
> > Visible links
> > 1. mailto:[3][4]sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1. mailto:[5]sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
> 2. mailto:[6]sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
> 3. mailto:[7]sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
References
Visible links
1. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
2. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
3. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
4. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
5. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
6. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
7. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com