On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 05:38:24PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On (05/05/14 23:42), Auke Kok wrote:
>> ---
>> configure.ac | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>> index baa5faa..5a90fe3 100644
>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ AC_FUNC_REALLOC
>> AC_FUNC_STRTOD
>> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([fdatasync getpagesize gettimeofday memmove memset mkdir munmap
pow realpath regcomp select setlocale socket sqrt strcasecmp strchr strdup strerror
strncasecmp strstr strtoul strtoull])
>>
>> -AC_SEARCH_LIBS([delwin], [ncursesw ncurses], [], AC_MSG_ERROR([ncurses is
required but was not found]), [])
>> +PKG_CHECK_MODULES([NCURSES], [ncurses], [LIBS="$LIBS
$ncurses_LIBS"],
> ^^^^^^^^^
> [ncursesw ncurses]?
On my gentoo system (x86_64) with ncurses 5.9, after applying this patch,
-lncurses is linked, but not -lncursesw.
Good question, I actually do not know, and I don't have an ncurses
pkgconfig around to see if that works.
Alexandra, can you see if this works with:
+PKG_CHECK_MODULES([NCURSES], [ncursesw ncurses], [LIBS="$LIBS $ncurses_LIBS"],
After hacking in this change, both -lncursesw and -lncurses are linked.
If I checkout the v2.5 tag, only -lncursesw is linked.
So, three different linking scenarios. Which one is "correct" for powertop?