Not all patches are at fault here so reverting the entire series
seems
short sighted. Even the patch in question isn't causing issues on all
platforms.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandra Yates [mailto:alexandra.yates@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:23 PM
To: powertop(a)lists.01.org
Cc: Kalowsky, Daniel
Subject: Re: [Powertop] segmentation fault when shutting
> On (05/09/14 00:22), Martin Ziegler wrote:
>> The bisection resulted in
>>
>> commit 5f5976f8b42e4e4717f2d573cf43cb87ccd88fa2
>> Author: Dan Kalowsky <daniel.kalowsky(a)intel.com>
>> Date: Tue Apr 29 15:55:31 2014 -0700
>>
>> Adding a clean_shutdown function
>>
>> Function is designed to be a on stop place to clean up
>> the entire application at shutdown time.
>>
>> as the first bad commit.
>>
>
> thanks, Martin.
>
> yes... well
>
> a) clean_shutdown() calls close_display() which iterates
> tab_windows[tab_names[i]] and deletes every tab_window. the problem is
> that prior to
> close_display() main executes clear_tuning(), which [surprise
> surprise] does `delete tune_window' since commit
> eb08d4480969c8e48347c7621bd96dc248ee2138
> ("Remove another memory leak") , whilst tab_windows[tab_names[i]]
> still holds a pointer which we just secretly free()-d. so this is
> double free().
> and it has no other option (and will never have) than to crash.
>
> this obviously has not been tested before push.
>
>
> b) there is no point in free()-ing memory which will be free()-d
> anyway, because we exit() the program.
>
> -ss
>
Martin, thank you for reporting and bisecting the culprit.
Sergey, thank you for poking the issues.
Dan, please fix the patches and resend them. They will be included after
release 2.6 is completed.
I reverted Dan Kalowsky's patches.
Thank you,
Alexandra.
Hi Dan,
I'm aware of that. However, I made an executive decision in favor of
PowerTOP2.6 release. Your patches will go in and will be included in the
next release after properly fixed and tested.
Thank you,
Alexandra.