On 3 August 2014 04:52, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On (08/02/14 23:20), Sami Kerola wrote:
>> On 2 August 2014 14:47, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >> Subject: [Powertop] [PATCH 07/12] move options structure to function
scope
>> >
>> > what for?
>>
>> They've told me keeping variables in as narrow scope as possible is a
>> virtue. Even if it would not be I don't see any harm of moving
>> everything out of global scope when ever possible.
>>
>>
https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/cplusplus/DCL07-CPP....
>
> this is different. let's keep it as is.
Hi Sergey,
That's alright the scope move is reverted. When I did that I started
to look the option structure, and later switch case segment. I started
to wonder why '-a' is marked as an option in structure but it is
missing from short options in optstring. That lead me to write two
small clean ups.
https://github.com/kerolasa/powertop/commit/09a3bb68d1f92c30675679b64d63c...
https://github.com/kerolasa/powertop/commit/8d81534bf55486b5230e18b217524...
Reminder. As mentioned yesterday, the patch series in maillist is
broken. Up to date versions of these changes are in my github branch,
which makes this a pull request.
https://github.com/kerolasa/powertop sami
Hi,
powertop does not pull from outside repos. please resend
your patch series to the list. thanks for your contribution.
-ss