2:19 a.m.
is this correct?
I listed it here for your reference.
12.04
# dpkg -L libnl1 | grep so
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libnl.so.1.1
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libnl.so.1
# dpkg -L libnl2 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2
# dpkg -L libnl-3-200 | grep so
/lib/libnl-3.so.200.3.0
/lib/libnl-3.so.200
# dpkg -L libnl-genl-3-200 | grep so
/lib/libnl-genl-3.so.200.3.0
/lib/libnl-genl-3.so.200
11.10
$ dpkg -L libnl1 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl.so.1.1
/usr/lib/libnl.so.1
$ dpkg -L libnl2 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl.so.2
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.2
$ dpkg -L libnl3 | grep so
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl.so.3.0.0
/usr/lib/libnl-cli.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl-genl.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl-nf.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl-route.so.3
/usr/lib/libnl.so.3
is 11.10 still supported?
I thought it should, but it is up to
you all maintainers:-)
2012/11/9 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
> On (11/09/12 20:18), Austin Zhang wrote:
> > > successful configure itself is useless, build is the one that
> matters.
> > Yes, I agree this, I just mean "not install genl is not the excuse of
> fail
> > to configure in _above_ cases".
>
> sorry, not sure.
> missing dependency is a very good reason to fail configure. in fact,
> configure is performed
> to validate system if it fits minimum build requirements. and in our case
> missing libnl
> and libnl-genl are a show stoppers.
>
> but yes, we have a problem with that ubuntu package mess that we have to
> address.
>
>
> > After double check, in libnl-3 of ubuntu 11.10 (sorry, I wrote it as
> 11.04
> > in above email) includes these content of lib-genl, so in 11.10, no
> > libnl-genl, which only is in 12.04, where the nl version is: 3.2.3.
> > and for libnl2, also no genl.
> >
>
is this correct?
>
> ubuntu libnl-3.*.so libnl-genl-3.*.so libnl-2.*.so
> libnl-genl-2.*.so
> 11.10 + - + -
> 12.04 + + + +
>
>
> is 11.10 still supported? if support for that version is discontinued then
> I'm not sure
> we really must care.
>
>
> -ss
>
>
> > 2012/11/9 Sergey Senozhatsky <[1]sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
> >
> > On (11/09/12 19:43), Austin Zhang wrote:
> > > >�but there are no evidence of,
> > > nl-gen will only impact compile rather than configure, right?
> > > Those above build time error will happen in upstream version
> if you
> > only
> > > install libnl3 but libnl-genl-3 for libnl3 case.
> > > But anyway, it shouldn't impact 'configure' action.�
> > >
> >
> > disagree, successful configure itself is useless, build is the one
> that
> > matters.
> > if one does not have all requirements for build, failed configure
> is ok.
> >
> > -ss
> >
> > > 2012/11/9 Sergey Senozhatsky <[1][2]
> sergey.senozhatsky(a)gmail.com>
> > >
> > > On (11/09/12 19:17), Austin Zhang wrote:
> > > > � �libnl3:
> > > > � �libnl-3.0 � � � � � � � � � � �libnl - Convenience
> library
> > for
> > > netlink
> > > > � �sockets
> > > > � �libnl2:
> > > > � �libnl-2.0 � � � � � � � � � � �libnl - Convenience
> library
> > for
> > > netlink
> > > > � �sockets
> > > >
> > >
> > > so, libnl-3.0.pc and libnl-2.0.pc are there, but there are no
> > evidence
> > > of, for example,
> > > libnl-genl
> > >
> > > pkg-config output on Arch
> > > libnl-3.0 � � � � � � � � � libnl - Convenience library for
> > netlink
> > > sockets
> > > libnl-cli-3.0 � � � � � � � libnl-cli - Command Line
> Interface
> > library
> > > for netlink sockets
> > > libnl-nf-3.0 � � � � � � � �libnl-nf - Netfilter Netlink
> Library
> > > libnl-route-3.0 � � � � � � libnl-route - Netlink Routing
> Family
> > Library
> > > libnl-genl-3.0 � � � � � � �libnl-genl - Generic Netlink
> Library
> > >
> > > in case if we remove libnl-genl from PKG_CHECK_MODULES,
we'll
> > break the
> > > build, because LIBNL_LIBS
> > > should be '-lnl-genl-3 -lnl-3', not just
'-lnl-3'.
> > >
> > > [..]
> > > src/tuning/iw.c:89: undefined reference to `genl_connect'
> > > src/tuning/iw.c:95: undefined reference to
> > `genl_ctrl_alloc_cache'
> > > src/tuning/iw.c:101: undefined reference to
> > `genl_ctrl_search_by_name'
> > > and so on...
> > >
> > > looks like we need to workaround ubuntu.
> > >
> > > � � � � -ss
> > >
> > > References
> > >
> > > Visible links
> > > 1. mailto:[3]sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
> >
> > References
> >
> > Visible links
> > 1. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
> > 2. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
> > 3. mailto:sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
>