1:50 a.m.
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes(a)openbossa.org>
When using libnl-3.0 we need to link with libnl-genl also, if not, we
get a lot of undefined symbols.
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 2d56684..3579b6e 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBZ], [zlib],[],[
has_libnl_ver=0
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-1], [has_libnl_ver=1], [
- AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [nl], [has_libnl_ver=2], [
+ AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [libnl-2.0], [has_libnl_ver=2], [
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-3.0 libnl-genl-3.0], [has_libnl_ver=3],
[AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [nl-3 nl-genl-3], [has_libnl_ver=3], [],
[])])
], [])
--
1.7.10.1
6:46 a.m.
New subject: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only libnl-3.0 is installed
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Vinicius Costa Gomes <vcgomes(a)gmail.com>wrote:
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes(a)openbossa.org>
When using libnl-3.0 we need to link with libnl-genl also, if not, we
get a lot of undefined symbols.
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 2d56684..3579b6e 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBZ], [zlib],[],[
has_libnl_ver=0
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-1], [has_libnl_ver=1], [
- AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [nl], [has_libnl_ver=2], [
+ AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [libnl-2.0], [has_libnl_ver=2], [
are you sure you want the linker to check for -llibnl-2.0? that means it's
going to try to find a "liblibnl-2.0.so" (note the double "lib"
here).
Auke
6:54 a.m.
New subject: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only libnl-3.0 is installed
On 5/12/2012 1:46 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Vinicius Costa Gomes <vcgomes(a)gmail.com
<mailto:vcgomes@gmail.com>> wrote:
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes(a)openbossa.org
<mailto:vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>>
When using libnl-3.0 we need to link with libnl-genl also, if not, we
get a lot of undefined symbols.
---
configure.ac <http://configure.ac> | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac <http://configure.ac> b/configure.ac
<http://configure.ac>
index 2d56684..3579b6e 100644
--- a/configure.ac <http://configure.ac>
+++ b/configure.ac <http://configure.ac>
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBZ], [zlib],[],[
has_libnl_ver=0
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-1], [has_libnl_ver=1], [
- AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [nl], [has_libnl_ver=2], [
+ AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [libnl-2.0],
[has_libnl_ver=2], [
are you sure you want the linker to check for -llibnl-2.0? that means
it's going to try to find a "liblibnl-2.0.so
<http://liblibnl-2.0.so>"
(note the double "lib" here).
Auke
this autoconf stuff is giving me a headache
maybe we should ask the libnl guys if they have some snippet that they
recommend.... after all I doubt we're the only ones dealing with their
library.
7:57 a.m.
New subject: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only libnl-3.0 is installed
On Saturday 2012-05-12 22:54, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> When using libnl-3.0 we need to link with libnl-genl also, if not, we
> get a lot of undefined symbols.
> ---
> has_libnl_ver=0
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBNL], [libnl-1], [has_libnl_ver=1], [
> - AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [nl], [has_libnl_ver=2], [
> + AC_SEARCH_LIBS([nl_socket_alloc], [libnl-2.0],
> [has_libnl_ver=2], [
>
> are you sure you want the linker to check for -llibnl-2.0? that means
> it's going to try to find a "liblibnl-2.0.so
<http://liblibnl-2.0.so>"
> (note the double "lib" here).
this autoconf stuff is giving me a headache
maybe we should ask the libnl guys if they have some snippet that they
recommend.... after all I doubt we're the only ones dealing with their
library.
libnl2 always has nl_socket_alloc, does it not? Why check for it?
(Why even bother with libnl1 and libnl2 anyway? They are obsolete.)
8:05 a.m.
New subject: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only libnl-3.0 is installed
(Why even bother with libnl1 and libnl2 anyway? They are obsolete.)
as long as latest Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu have the current one, I
wouldn't mind just ditching support for the old ones...
8:38 a.m.
New subject: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only libnl-3.0 is installed
On Sunday 2012-05-13 00:05, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> (Why even bother with libnl1 and libnl2 anyway? They are obsolete.)
as long as latest Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu have the current one
They do
3:48 a.m.
New subject: [Powertop] [PATCH] Fix trying to use libnl-2.0 when only libnl-3.0 is installed
On 05/12/2012 03:38 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 2012-05-13 00:05, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> (Why even bother with libnl1 and libnl2 anyway? They are obsolete.)
> as long as latest Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu have the current one
They do
Can't ditch the old ones as they are still used by older
distributions.
_______________________________________________
PowerTop mailing list
PowerTop(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/powertop
3779
days inactive
3781
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Arjan van de Ven -
Chris Ferron -
Jan Engelhardt -
Kok, Auke-jan H -
Vinicius Costa Gomes