[Bug 2424] test and support zyb.com
by bugzilla＠moblin.org
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2424
pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #41 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-12-10 04:08:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> (In reply to comment #39)
> > We still need to mark ZYB as a "consumerReady" service.
>
> Done on branch 'mb2424'.
Merged.
> Do we need add something in NEWS?
I'll mention it when I write up the NEWS for alpha 2.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 8005] New: syncevolution 9.1 crashes
by bugzilla＠moblin.org
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8005
Summary: syncevolution 9.1 crashes
Classification: Moblin Projects
Product: SyncEvolution
Version: upstream
Platform: Netbook
OS/Version: Moblin Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: Undecided
Component: SyncEvolution
AssignedTo: patrick.ohly(a)intel.com
ReportedBy: gassauer(a)kde.org
QAContact: yanshuang.zheng(a)intel.com
CC: shuang.wan(a)intel.com, syncevolution(a)lists.intel.com
after update to the latest OpenSuSE 11.1 rpms (including packman and KDE 4.3.3
repo)
(gdb) run "chricar funambol"
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/syncevolution "chricar funambol"
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7fffee5aa950 (LWP 18812)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7f92950 (LWP 18819)]
[New Thread 0x7fffedda9950 (LWP 18821)]
[Thread 0x7fffedda9950 (LWP 18821) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffedda9950 (LWP 18826)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff6cd8bc9 in icalcomponent_isa () from /usr/lib64/libecal-1.2.so.7
rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libecal-1.2.so.7
evolution-data-server-2.24.1.1-5.12.1
l /usr/lib64/libecal-1.2*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2009-11-13 12:35 /usr/lib64/libecal-1.2.so ->
libecal-1.2.so.7.2.1*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2009-11-13 12:35 /usr/lib64/libecal-1.2.so.7 ->
libecal-1.2.so.7.2.1*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 805288 2009-04-16 02:32 /usr/lib64/libecal-1.2.so.7.2.1*
any idea?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 8338] New: Compilation on Debian 5.0.3 fails
by bugzilla＠moblin.org
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8338
Summary: Compilation on Debian 5.0.3 fails
Classification: Moblin Projects
Product: SyncEvolution
Version: upstream
Platform: Generic
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: Undecided
Component: SyncEvolution
AssignedTo: patrick.ohly(a)intel.com
ReportedBy: knipp(a)m-otion.com
QAContact: yanshuang.zheng(a)intel.com
CC: syncevolution(a)lists.intel.com
I did the following procedure:
git clone git://git.moblin.org/syncevolution.git
cd syncevolution
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-g -Wall -Werror -Wno-unknown-pragmas" CXXFLAGS="-g -Wall
-Werror -Wno-unknown-pragmas" --enable-libcurl --disable-shared
--enable-developer-mode
-with-synthesis-src=git://git.moblin.org/libsynthesis.git --disable-ebook
--disable-ecal
make
make stops during linking syncevolution:
g++ -I/home/knipp/tmp/syncevolution/src/build-synthesis/src -g -Wall -Werror
-Wno-unknown-pragmas -uSyncEvolution_Module_Version -Wl,--export-dynamic -o
syncevolution syncevolution-syncevolution.o syncevolution-CmdlineSyncClient.o
syncevolution-AddressBookSourceRegister.o
syncevolution-EvolutionCalendarSourceRegister.o
syncevolution-EvolutionContactSourceRegister.o
syncevolution-FileSyncSourceRegister.o
syncevolution-SQLiteContactSourceRegister.o syncevolution-test.o
backends/addressbook/.libs/syncaddressbook.a
backends/evolution/.libs/syncebook.a backends/evolution/.libs/syncecal.a
/home/knipp/tmp/syncevolution/src/syncevo/.libs/libsyncevolution.a
backends/file/.libs/syncfile.a backends/sqlite/.libs/syncsqlite.a
syncevo/.libs/libsyncevolution.a
/home/knipp/tmp/syncevolution/src/build-synthesis/src/.libs/libsynthesissdk.a
/home/knipp/tmp/syncevolution/src/build-synthesis/src/.libs/libsynthesis.a
-lpcre /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so -ldl -lpthread /usr/lib/libexpat.so
/home/knipp/tmp/syncevolution/src/build-synthesis/src/.libs/libsmltk.a -lz
/usr/lib/libcurl.so /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so
syncevolution-syncevolution.o: In function `main':
/home/knipp/tmp/syncevolution/src/syncevolution.cpp:109: undefined reference to
`g_type_init'
/home/knipp/tmp/syncevolution/src/syncevolution.cpp:110: undefined reference to
`g_thread_init'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
A patch solving the problem:
diff --git a/configure-pre.in b/configure-pre.in
index 9c2ceba..91e4f58 100644
--- a/configure-pre.in
+++ b/configure-pre.in
@@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ AC_SUBST(MODIFY_SYNCCOMPARE)
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(signal.h dlfcn.h)
+AC_CHECK_LIB(gthread-2.0,g_thread_init)
+AC_CHECK_LIB(gobject-2.0,g_type_init)
+
# cppunit needed?
if test $enable_unit_tests == "yes" || test $enable_integration_tests == yes;
then
CPPUNIT_CXXFLAGS=`cppunit-config --cflags` ||
AC_MSG_ERROR("cppunit-config --cflags failed - is it installed?")
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 2229] D-Bus and sync-UI: progress spinner
by bugzilla＠moblin.org
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2229
--- Comment #31 from yongsheng zhu <yongsheng.zhu(a)intel.com> 2009-12-08 00:37:13 PST ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > > Your code should:
> > > - call reportStepCmd() directly after m_engine.SessionStep()
> > > *and* after handling its result
> > > - treat STEPCMD_SENTDATA, STEPCMD_NEEDDATA, STEPCMD_RESENDDATA as steps
> > > which set "waiting"
> > > - everything else sets "processing"
> > reasonable. 'STEPCMD_SENTDATA' should be 'STEPCMD_SENDDATA'?
>
> Yes, that was a typo.
>
> > > In the later case we should never send "processing" at all, because it became
> > > redundant. I prefer that approach. It'll require changes to the if() clause
> > > above: instead of checking m_syncStatus, we would check the content on
> > > m_stepInfo.
> > I also like this idea. Then I just check whether m_stepInfo is 'waiting', if
> > yes, append it in the status.
>
> Please also add clarifications to the D-Bus API spec: "waiting" = waiting for
> some external event, typically IO (regardless what kind); remove "processing"
> and explain that the absense of "waiting" implies that we are done with
> waiting.
done. please review.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
12 years, 9 months
[Bug 2229] D-Bus and sync-UI: progress spinner
by bugzilla＠moblin.org
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2229
--- Comment #30 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-12-08 00:04:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> > Your code should:
> > - call reportStepCmd() directly after m_engine.SessionStep()
> > *and* after handling its result
> > - treat STEPCMD_SENTDATA, STEPCMD_NEEDDATA, STEPCMD_RESENDDATA as steps
> > which set "waiting"
> > - everything else sets "processing"
> reasonable. 'STEPCMD_SENTDATA' should be 'STEPCMD_SENDDATA'?
Yes, that was a typo.
> > In the later case we should never send "processing" at all, because it became
> > redundant. I prefer that approach. It'll require changes to the if() clause
> > above: instead of checking m_syncStatus, we would check the content on
> > m_stepInfo.
> I also like this idea. Then I just check whether m_stepInfo is 'waiting', if
> yes, append it in the status.
Please also add clarifications to the D-Bus API spec: "waiting" = waiting for
some external event, typically IO (regardless what kind); remove "processing"
and explain that the absense of "waiting" implies that we are done with
waiting.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
12 years, 9 months