August 2009 - Syncevolution-issues

[Bug 3601] widgets should live in nbtk, not syncevolution source

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601 pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|GTK UI |* Feature Request AssignedTo|jku(a)linux.intel.com |syncevolution(a)lists.intel.c | |om Target Milestone|--- |future QAContact|jingke.zhang(a)intel.com | --- Comment #4 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 23:56:00 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Old issue it is. > It seems a code issue which can affect some usage, doesn't it? No, this doesn't have user visible effects => enhancement. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 3236] copy-paste code in wrapper lib and server

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3236 pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|GTK UI |* Feature Request AssignedTo|jku(a)linux.intel.com |syncevolution(a)lists.intel.c | |om QAContact|jingke.zhang(a)intel.com | --- Comment #3 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 23:54:56 --- Like 2061 this is more like an enhancement request, not something to worry about in the current release. Perhaps it'll be resolved by implementing the server side differently (libgdbus)? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2061] dbus api should expose sync reports as hashtables

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2061 pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |patrick.ohly(a)intel.com Component|SyncEvolution |* Feature Request AssignedTo|jku(a)linux.intel.com |syncevolution(a)lists.intel.c | |om QAContact|yanshuang.zheng(a)intel.com | --- Comment #5 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 23:46:50 --- Turning this into an enhancement, because the current code works without causing user visible problems. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2260] need interface to set useProxy or not

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2260 --- Comment #6 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 23:45:10 --- (In reply to comment #4) > So old feature request it is. :) > Since SyncEvolution can use system http well (in many situation, user does not > need proxy at all), I can accept no such setting in current GUI design. > > Change it to enhancement. and welcome comments. I agree. We might even go one step further and close it completely: in my GNOME settings I can set a proxy and also hosts for which it doesn't apply. I still think libsoup should handle that automatically, without having to disable the system proxy in SyncEvolution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 3479] EDS: protect against concurrent editing + revision handling

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3479 --- Comment #9 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 23:36:23 --- (In reply to comment #8) > After reading the eds-dbus code, I suspect "RETURN-REV" capability can't be > implemented for existing non-atomic calls. > > The reason is: the dbus call does not return "revision" or "Contact", the > changed item is asynchronously popped up by another signal ("contacts-changed", > etc.). What's worse, the signal has a buffering mechanism, it will not emit as > soon as a contact is changed(maybe delayed to a later point to pop up a batch > of changes). > Two solutions: 1) change the dbus interface (incompatible) Isn't that interface EDS internal anyway and thus can be changed as necessary? Packagers must be sure to not put incompatible libebook and EDS on the same system, but that has always been the case. That packagers sometimes forgot about the necessary "conflicts" entries in their packages is a different problem... > For > the new added atomic calls, we can use a different dbus interface which will > return the "revision" information from the dbus method call. Using different communication paths with EDS to implement the old and new update/delete calls smells like unnecessary code duplication to me. I'd rather extend the protocol so that it works for the more advanced new calls and then map the old ones to the new ones in libebook (they are intentionally strict subsets). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 3601] widgets should live in nbtk, not syncevolution source

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601 --- Comment #3 from ZhangJingke <jingke.zhang(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 19:56:48 --- Old issue it is. It seems a code issue which can affect some usage, doesn't it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 3236] copy-paste code in wrapper lib and server

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3236 --- Comment #2 from ZhangJingke <jingke.zhang(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 19:52:16 --- Long time no update for this issue. Jussi, please give some plan when you have time. Thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2629] Need an obvious way to get out of settings

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2629 --- Comment #8 from ZhangJingke <jingke.zhang(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 19:48:19 --- (In reply to comment #4) > This issue is solved in the new sync design partly by having a button with the > label 'Back to sync' at the bottom of the settings page. > > Jussi: If you want to, you can add this button to the existing design but if > it's hard then it'd be better to spend more sync hacking time on implementing > the new design as that solves a *lot* of other issues as well. hi Jussy, As Nick mentioned, we have got 'Back to sync' button in "change sync services" applet. I feel it is better to add same button to service "Setup and use" applet. :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2414] if last sync failed, this is not shown in the 'statistics'

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2414 --- Comment #5 from ZhangJingke <jingke.zhang(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 19:30:49 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Marking future, I haven't been able to get 2061 solved yet. If a failed sync happened, we had better to let user to know it. We can firstly know the fixing plan for bug#2061 . :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2061] dbus api should expose sync reports as hashtables

by bugzilla＠moblin.org

http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2061 ZhangJingke <jingke.zhang(a)intel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jingke.zhang(a)intel.com --- Comment #4 from ZhangJingke <jingke.zhang(a)intel.com> 2009-08-11 19:28:45 --- QA began to review all the old bugs. :) It is better to expose as much info as possible to GUI (not urgent now). For all the information, GUI's responsibily is only to show them. As this issue blocks bug#2414 , we need some update. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

Syncevolution-issues August 2009