[Syncevolution-issues] [Bug 6181] Package SyncEvolution core as a library for third party developers
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6181
--- Comment #3 from Chen Congwu <congwu.chen(a)intel.com> 2009-09-17 00:17:14 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(Edit typos)
Instead of splitting the library into the api and implementation
part, maybe we
can distribute only api related header files; other header files (CurlTransport
Impl, SoupTransport Impl, ObexTransportImpl, EvolutionSyncClient,
SynthesisEngine related) will not be distributed.
This reduces the dependency as well as keeping it clean. If we later decide to
distribute more functionality,change the make rule to distribute more
corresponding library headers.
Is it better?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.