http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6376
--- Comment #7 from pohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> 2009-12-11 00:59:44 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
> Can we drop the wait() call and go fully asynchronous? When starting the
> infoRequest(), register a callback that is called and then let responses be
> handled inside the existing main loop handling.
For password, the engine needs this password to generate syncML message and
have to wait response, we have to let process wait for this. what if we want to
this?
I don't know. So what this boils down to is prototyping the API and adding the
necessary calls to it in those places where we need to make info requests.
That'll expose weaknesses in the API.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.moblin.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.