Comment # 6 on bug 76471 from
Patrick,

"Using "--sync local-cache preventslowsync=0" worked for me here. That
preventslowsync=0 has to be specified explicitly is a bit unexpected. It should
be implied automatically by local-cache or local-cache-incremental. I'll fix
that."

Did this get fixed? If so I'll test with a newer release than what I had
previously checked. If not I'll just suggest adding this option to our client.


You are receiving this mail because: