--- Comment #3 from Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)gmx.de> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Yes It is usable but the double quotation may lead to implementation
This is anyway minor issue.
At least we should provide some information on how to decode it.
The PHOTO value is an URL. That already defines how to decode it, there's
nothing special about it.
In particular, you cannot just strip a the file:// prefix and use the remainder
as file name. One has to do URL decoding. Whether encoding is really used is a
different matter. The code has to assume that it is, and from that perspective
it is actually good to have it tested.
Obviously it is less nice for testers and developers.
Do we agree to treat this as a low priority feature request for EDS ("avoid
quoting of number when creating photos") that can be deferred?
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.