Hello! I have tagged and built SyncEvolution 1.99.1, a pre-release of what will become 2.0.0. As discussed in https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/syncevolution@syncevolution.org/thre... I am simplifying the binaries (no more i386, no KDE). The new release is available as: - source code: https://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/sources/syncevolution-1... https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/SyncEvolution/syncevolution - tar archive: https://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/bundle/amd64-tar-gz/syn... - in the *experimental* apt repo: deb http://downloads.syncevolution.org/apt experimental main The GPG key for all apt repos were renewed. To get the current signing key, use sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 43D03AD9 Speaking of signing keys, so far I used an expiry period of one year. Would anyone care if I made that longer? The .deb package installs on Debian Stable and Ubuntu Bionic. It does not currently install on Debian Testing and Ubuntu Groovy because libcppunit changed its ABI. I intend to address that before 2.0.0. As a workaround, one can manually install https://packages.debian.org/buster/amd64/libcppunit-1.14-0/download manually beforehand (untested!). I have tested the new binaries with Bluetooth/OBEX and a Nokia N97 and CardDAV with Google Contacts. Automated testing is also up again, but with less coverage than before (only Memotoo for SyncML, Google Contacts, Google Calendar). Testing is based on containers now. If someone wants to see interoperability and/or compilation tested with other platforms (TDE, OwnCloud), then a Dockerfile which prepares a suitable environment would be a good start for adding that. -- Best Regards Patrick Ohly _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list -- syncevolution(a)syncevolution.org To unsubscribe send an email to syncevolution-leave(a)syncevolution.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s

I have tagged and built SyncEvolution 1.99.1, a pre-release of what will become 2.0.0.

Milan Crha <mcrha(a)redhat.com&gt; writes: > On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 12:40 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: >> I have tagged and built SyncEvolution 1.99.1, a pre-release of what >> will become 2.0.0. > > Hi, > I gave it a try under Fedora Rawhide and after removing unneeded > downstream patches and updating one due to the boost changes (see the > attached patch) I get a linker error (see the very end of the log): > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2132/58912132/build.log Unfortunately I looked at this too late and now the link isn't working anymore. Do you have a more recent build log with the failure? I also tried to reproduce this and (at the same time) prevent future regressions by building on rawhide inside a Docker container. However, that currently fails because rawhide containers don't work on current runc runtimes (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900021).

On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 14:20 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Do you have a more recent build log with the failure? Hi, sure, I re-ran the build here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61020990 On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 18:23 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lkdeui > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lkdecore Fedora carries a patch for it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/syncevolution/blob/master/f/syncevolut...

> Perhaps also remove KDE support from the Fedora .spec file? Right, I can probably do it. I only do not know how many users are actually using it.

If you know there are issues with it, then the best would be, probably, to drop the code from the sources, otherwise I'm afraid the users might eventually request to enable it in the package.

Milan, can you perhaps try those sources without akonadi?

I opened this new bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926932