On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 15:07 +0000, stephan wrote:
Sorry for my late reply. Yes, it definitely makes more sense and I
think it's a
great improvement of the documentation. I've read through it and I really have a
better picture of how things work now. I'm looking forward to tweak my
configuration of syncevolution a bit ;-) Maybe I come back with some questions
later - but I think most of it has been clearified. Thank you!
Thanks for the feedback. I'm glad it passed muster. I've merged it into
the SyncEvolution 1.2 maintenance and the master branches.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.