Re: [SyncEvolution] configuration testing
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 05:43 +0000, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote:
Hi,
> Now my question is: should the CPPUnit-based tests be replaced by
> Python/D-Bus ones? The advantage is that we only have to maintain the
> tests once, possibly in some easier form. The disadvantage is that
> without D-Bus enabled, that test doesn't work, and that we haven't
> integrated the D-Bus tests into our nightly testing.
Yes. Another thing is that I think moving current test cases from CPPUnit-based
also need much work to do. But I'm inclined to move. Because this could also make
us maintenance and write new cases easier.
Do ' CPPUnit-based tests' include interoperability tests with servers?
Yes. The whole client-test program is based on CPPUnit. Rewriting all of
that in Python would be quite a bit of work, so I'd prefer to only drop
a test in the CPPUnit part if some replacement/improvement has to be
written in Python anyway.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.