Re: [SyncEvolution] Syncing multiple calendars on SyncEvolution server side

On Mi, 2011-01-05 at 15:36 +0000, John Dykstra wrote: I assume you mean libpcre. Are you sure that this was with a recent release? libpcre usage is optional and was turned off intentionally a while back to increase compatibility. In 1.1.1, ldd still shows it, but only as an indirect dependency. The libs and binaries in SyncEvolution do not depend on it: $ for i in usr/lib/libsyncevolution.so usr/lib/libsynthesis.so usr/lib/libsmltk.so usr/bin/syncevolution usr/libexec/syncevo-dbus-server usr/lib/syncevolution/*.so usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/*.so; do echo $i:; if readelf -a $i | grep NEED | grep -q pcre; then echo has pcre; else echo no pcre; fi; done usr/lib/libsyncevolution.so: no pcre usr/lib/libsynthesis.so: no pcre usr/lib/libsmltk.so: no pcre usr/bin/syncevolution: no pcre usr/libexec/syncevo-dbus-server: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/libgdbus.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncaddressbook.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncebook.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncecal.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncfile.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/synckcalextended.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncmaemocal.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncqtcontacts.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncsqlite.so: no pcre usr/lib/syncevolution/backends/syncxmlrpc.so: no pcre -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.