Re: [SyncEvolution] questions about sync reports
> I expected the order of reports to be from youngest to oldest.
I'm
> pretty sure I wrote that in the docs originally, but it's not there now.
> I still think that order would make sense.
Yes, definitely. If it is neither in the spec nor the documentation,
then we need to add that. Yongsheng is currently working in this aspect,
see MB #8049.
Yes, it's a bug. Currently the order is reversed incorrectly.
I'll fix it soon.
Cheers,
Yongsheng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: syncevolution-bounces(a)syncevolution.org
> [mailto:syncevolution-bounces@syncevolution.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Ohly
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:20 PM
> To: Jussi Kukkonen
> Cc: SyncEvolution
> Subject: Re: [SyncEvolution] questions about sync reports
>
> On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 07:13 +0000, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> I expected the order of reports to be from youngest to oldest.
I'm
> pretty sure I wrote that in the docs originally, but it's not there now.
> I still think that order would make sense.
Yes, definitely. If it is neither in the spec nor the documentation,
then we need to add that. Yongsheng is currently working in this aspect,
see MB #8049.
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
>
> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
> on behalf of Intel on this matter.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SyncEvolution mailing list
> SyncEvolution(a)syncevolution.org
> http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution