On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 12:24 +0200, tino wrote:
------- Original message -------
> From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>
> To: tino.keitel+syncevolution(a)tikei.de
> Cc: syncevolution(a)syncevolution.org
> Sent: 7.8.'12, 9:07
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 21:18 +0200, tino.keitel+syncevolution(a)tikei.de
>> what is the state of 184.108.40.206? I looks like there are quite some
>> interesting bugs since the syncevolution-1-2-99-3 git tag.
> True. I probably should just go ahead and tag+compile 220.127.116.11. Or
> perhaps go for 1.3 directly?
> What do you and users think? Does 1.3 need more time for testing or
> should I just go ahead and pull the trigger?
maybe it is a good idea to release 18.104.22.168 and rename it to 1.3 if nothing
serious pops up for a few days.
I tagged 22.214.171.124 this morning, a sanity build + test run is on-going.
Renaming it to 1.3 will require another recompile, because the version
number is embedded in the configure script and resulting binaries.
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.