On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 01:57 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Patrick Ohly
> Is this support likely to be compiled in in the
> I'd prefer to keep with the test program for SyncEvolution.
I think I can add it next week.
Sorry, the Google CardDAV interoperability kept me and the nightly build
I enabled provideruoa.so compilation on Ubuntu Saucy and will include it
in the next SyncEvolution 126.96.36.199. I hesitate to say next week again,
but that actually is the goal.
Would it be problematic to enable the xmlrpc backend also?
I checked, enabling that would indeed be problematic. The backend
depends on the C++ version of xmlrpc, which changed the ABI between
Ubuntu Saucy and Trusty. If I compiled on Saucy (which is fairly easy to
do because I have the distro already set up for compiling some part of
the binary release), then the backend won't work on Trusty.
I'd prefer to not spend more effort on offering a binary which only one
user asked for at the moment.
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.