On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 23:51 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Ohly, Patrick
> <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
>         I don't think we have consensus on the revised terminology. My
>         updated readme will need further changes.
> I understand that it will; I'll keep tracking those changes. I feel I
> sort of have a grasp on things now, and I want to start writing while
> it's fresh in my mind. If the conceptual model that I have in my head
> is wrong, it'll need revising anyhow. If the model is OK but the
> terminology is off, that should be easy enough to fix. I find it
> easier in general to have something flawed out for correction than to
> try and aim for perfection before starting; it's easier to point out
> flaws than to built something without flaws. I don't mind rework.

Okay. I was just worried that you might get disappointed when the
terminology changes again.

I'm a scrum master at work; I tend to prefer flawed products over perfect concepts. I've pushed out a new version at http://reichenhack.github.io/syncevolution.html that now adds google sync; I'd love it if someone could go over it to see if there are mistakes left. I know there are many commands that con be combined; I intend to add that as a separate section as soon as I know the verbose explanation is correct. If that turns out to be the case, then these are the next steps:

1. OAuth2 for Google
2. Compact command lines, setting up multiple configs in one go
3. Start rewriting the other HOWTO's I find strewn about building off this one.