On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:48 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> The exception is that these updates really have to be
> to be barely noticable (IMHO every 5 minutes would be okay). The
> question to the consumers of such an event then becomes: is this too
> coarse to be useful?
> Jussi, what do you think?
No, that's not too coarse. An even more silent option is:
* GetAutosyncStatus() method that returns next estimated sync time
and possible reason/status
* AutosyncStatusChanged-signal that is fired when estimated time or
Is there a problem with something like this?
No, I don't think so. Feature request for future versions, so let's
"syncevo-dbus-server: notify clients about automatic sync schedule"
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.