On So, 2010-12-26 at 07:31 +0000, Giancarlo wrote:
Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...> writes:
> As usual, I'd like to write down some thoughts on future functionality
> before actually implement it.
May I suggest also some way to have an encrypted channel, either through https
Right, forgot about those. ssh would require changes in SyncEvolution,
but would be doable. https probably has more advantages.
--server-certificate=<file> certificate used by the server to identify
itself (TODO: details about file content)
I'm not planning to support client certificate checking, at least not
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.