Re: [SyncEvolution] Website: "peers"
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 17:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
The overall goal with syncevolution.org was to give users an idea of
what is known to work and what isn't. In this case the answer for
certain cases is "we don't know" - I still find it better to spell
that
non-answer out somewhere, ideally somewhere where the user looks for
it,
instead of having him search the whole site for an answer that can't
be
found.
But are you ever likely to mention indirect combinations that do work or
to mention combinations that you don't know work. At the moment there's
just a long-winded way of saying that something might not work.
--
murrayc(a)murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com