On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:

On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 18:29 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
> Wouldn't a move to either github pages or github wiki be easiest,
> management-wise?

Are you suggesting to move just the Wiki pages or all content?

Either or both. Depends on your preference.

I am looking for a solution where someone else takes over the primary
responsibility for making syncevolution.org useful to users and nice
looking (ideally both at the same time ;-).

I can't guarantee that on my own, but as I'll be re-writing most of the HOWTOs anyway, I could take point for a while.

Re-enabling the Wiki elsewhere may still be better than not having one
at all, but looks like a stop-gap measure to me. I don't have any
particular preference where such a Wiki could be hosted.

So you'd really just want to get rid of the Wiki?

Most of the Wiki pages are already in Markdown syntax. The rest is a
mixture of HTML and Markdown, for no particular reason. The only page
which would be hard to do in Markdown is the "usage" page, because that
is a verbatim extract of the automatically generated README.html page.

That's not an issue, Github's Pages infrastructure deals with mixed content just fine.

I can grant you an additional role so that you can edit (and thus view)
the source of each page. What's your username on syncevolution.org?

It's 'ReichenHack', but if possible I'd prefer a database dump over/in addition to website access.

Emile