On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>wrote:
On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 01:57 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com>
> > Is this support likely to be compiled in in the foreseeable
> > I'd prefer to keep with the test program for SyncEvolution.
> I think I can add it next week.
Sorry, the Google CardDAV interoperability kept me and the nightly build
I enabled provideruoa.so compilation on Ubuntu Saucy and will include
in the next SyncEvolution 184.108.40.206. I hesitate to say next week again,
but that actually is the goal.
Also not a problem.
> Would it be problematic to enable the xmlrpc backend also?
I checked, enabling that would indeed be problematic. The backend
depends on the C++ version of xmlrpc, which changed the ABI between
Ubuntu Saucy and Trusty. If I compiled on Saucy (which is fairly easy to
do because I have the distro already set up for compiling some part of
the binary release), then the backend won't work on Trusty.
I'd prefer to not spend more effort on offering a binary which only one
user asked for at the moment.
And no objections to that at all. I'll see what I can put together, knowing
that these can be compiled and loaded separately. In the end, I want a
scriptable backend, I just figured that if xmlrpc was already there, an
xmlrpc proxy would be easier to create than a new SyncEvolution backend.