Re: [SyncEvolution] D-Bus server reorganization
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 13:11 +0200, Chris Kühl wrote:
One question I do have about style is what is the preferred file
nameing
scheme. Some are in module-class-name form, others in module-ClassName
form, and still others in ClassName form. I'll be happy to make my new
files reflect the desired scheme.
I forgot to answer this. I don't have a strong opinion about this. I'm
not a fan of the "one class per file" paradigm. IMHO it leads to a
needless proliferation of files. I prefer to group related classes in a
single header and implementation file.
On the other hand, it is more obvious where code is to be found when the
file name is the same as the class name, once one knows the class name.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.