Re: [SyncEvolution] syncing nokia series 40 phones

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dmitry Teslenko <dteslenko(a)gmail.com&gt; Date: Mon, May 10, 2010 at 21:48 Subject: Re: [SyncEvolution] syncing nokia series 40 phones To: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com&gt; On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:05, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com&gt; wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 06:37 +0100, Dmitry Teslenko wrote: >> Hello! >> Does anybody have luck syncing with nokia series 40 phone (nokia 3500 >> for example) via bluetooth? > > Yes, the Nokia 7120c is a S40 and works. > >> I'm using syncevolution 1.0 beta3. >> >> I run syncevo-phone-config for first time and it could pick any > > "could not"? > >> working configuration, however it could write following items: >> * contact >> * note >> * todo > > Sorry, I don't follow. > > Can you try to setup the phone using "--template 'Nokia 7210c'" and then > sync the "addressbook"? > > In which sync modes does that work ("--sync refresh-from-server", > "--sync refresh-from-client", "--sync two-way")? > > > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. > > > Ok, I've done so: syncevolution --configure --template "Nokia 7210c" --sync-property syncURL=obex-bt://00:1E:A3:F1:18:53 phone syncevolution --sync refresh-from-server phone addressbook syncevolution --sync refresh-from-client phone addressbook syncevolution --sync two-way phone addressbook All results were the same: [INFO] Server sending SAN [ERROR] OBEX Request 2 got a failed response Forbidden [INFO] Server sending SAN [ERROR] OBEX Request 3 got a failed response Not found [ERROR] ObexTransprotAgent: Underlying transport error Changes applied during synchronization: +---------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|-CON-+ |               |         LOCAL         |        REMOTE         | FLI | |        Source | NEW | MOD | DEL | ERR | NEW | MOD | DEL | ERR | CTS | +---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ |   addressbook |  0  |  0  |  0  |  0  |  0  |  0  |  0  |  0  |  0  | +---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ |          start Mon May 10 21:43:12 2010, duration 0:04min           | |          external transport failure (local, status 20043)           | +---------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ First ERROR encountered: OBEX Request 2 got a failed response Forbidden -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?