Re: [SyncEvolution] future direction for SyncEvolution (was: Re: OpenSync: fragmentation is harmful)

On Di, 2011-01-04 at 19:24 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: I stand corrected. My bait has worked, now I don't need to search myself ;-} The patent disclaimer is interesting: ----------------------------- THIS IS NOT A GRANT OF PATENT RIGHTS. Google makes no representation or warranty that the source code made available hereunder is unencumbered by third-party patents. Those intending to use this source code in hardware or software products are advised that implementations of this code, including in open source software or shareware, may require patent licenses from the relevant patent holders. ----------------------------- -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.