Re: [SyncEvolution] Concurrent sync sessions update - Almost done
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly(a)intel.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 17:18 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
> It's been rebased and we've squashed the changes into about a dozen
> commits. The tests seem to give us the same results as before the
> rebase.
And those are? In other words, which tests are known to fail, and why?
I've pushed a branch called css-without-known-test-failures[1] whose
most recent commit comments out all the tests in test/test-dbus.py
that fail. However, there as a bug I introduced during the last
rebase. The fix for that can be found here[2].
All but one of the failures is due to the incomplete AutoSync and
Connection functionality. The restart test has never worked for us on
any branch.
Cheers,
Chris
[1]
https://meego.gitorious.org/meego-middleware/syncevolution/commit/d880525...
[2]
https://meego.gitorious.org/~krnowak/meego-middleware/krnowaks-syncevolut...