On Mo, 2011-01-10 at 16:12 +0000, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> One can actually define the "key" after X-KADDRESSBOOK-*.
> My Guess is that the key is supposed to be unique (or else all but the
> data from the last key is wiped out, if the key is of the same
> "datatype", if the key is of different data type, the data is being
> reset), because the user can define a "Title" for each field he adds,
> and assign a "Value" to the title, and KAddressbook will take care of
> the mapping from keys to titles. I will confirm this with the
> maintainer soon.
Knowing that would indeed be useful.
Any update? Note that Lukas has implemented support for preserving
arbitrary extensions (see his "luz" branch or the "master" branch on
), but it is not enabled yet in the SyncEvolution
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.