Re: [SyncEvolution] Concurrent sync sessions update - Almost done
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 17:18 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
It's been rebased and we've squashed the changes into about a
dozen
commits. The tests seem to give us the same results as before the
rebase.
And those are? In other words, which tests are known to fail, and why?
I'm running the tests here myself. I'd like to compare notes and avoid
investigating failures that are already known.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.